Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7320 p514-515
9 October 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 100K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Pharmacy education
· Primary care
· Community pharmacy
· Technicians
· Acute diverticulitis
· Oxygen
· Dispensing errors
· Charitable donations
· Returned medicines
· BPC
· Blood-brain barrier
· CPD
· Overseas membership
· The register
· Retention fee
· The Society
· The Journal


Letters to the Editor

Charitable donations

Reissuing returned medicines to developing countries

Why donations are such a bad idea

Reissuing returned medicines to developing countries

From Mrs P. Bradshaw, MRPharmS, and Dr A. Jarvis, FRCGP

As stated in The Pharmaceutical Journal of 18 September (p378), the Department of Health is encouraging hospitals to reissue patients’ own medicines to them after inspection by properly trained staff. Each year community pharmacies receive from patients some of the £500m worth of unused dispensed medicines which are then sent for incineration. Yet more than one third of the world’s population have no access to even the most reasonably priced generic medicines. Many governments in Africa spend less than £3 a head on medicines, including vaccines, for their populations.

There is a registered charity called Inter Care (www.intercare.org.uk) that has been collecting appropriate returned medicines and samples from GP surgeries for many years. These are inspected and sorted initially by either a pharmacist or a doctor and then properly trained staff. If suitable, with at least a year to run before the expiry date, and if the packaging and contents are complete, they are dispatched. The recipients are rural, resource-poor non-governmental health units in Africa. Each unit is staffed by medically qualified personnel able to diagnose, prescribe and dispense and each unit is visited and monitored by Inter Care staff.

Only essential medicines on the World Health Organization lists are selected by Inter Care to send to Africa and also only those medicines specifically requested by the units are sent to them.

Inter Care would like to arrange a pilot scheme to collect suitable returned medicines from community pharmacies that would like to co-operate in the scheme. However the Department of Health says that “medicines should not be reused once they have been dispensed to patients, because storage conditions are unknown and quality and safety cannot be guaranteed. Yet the DoH is encouraging hospitals to reuse medicines that have been stored in patients’ own homes. Furthermore, the minimum protective standards for pharmaceutical packaging now state that the formulation must remain stable and fully active after a minimum of six months at 40C and 75 per cent humidity. In the US, controlled reissuing of returned patients’ medicines is already allowed.

Pamela Bradshaw
Trustee

Anthony Jarvis
Medical Director
Inter Care

(e-mail intercare@webleicester.co.uk)


Why donations are such a bad idea

From Ms C. M. Green, MRPharmS

The comparison that Geoff Crumplin and Joy Wingfield used in their Broad spectrum article (PJ, 18 September, p378) was unhelpful both to their own argument and to people in need of essential drugs overseas. I think it is necessary to spell out just why donations of unwanted medicines from UK patients are such a bad idea.

In the UK, when dispensed medicines are reissued, patients who have been in hospital receive back the medicines that they brought in with them. The medicines return to the storage conditions that they had been in before admission. They are checked by a hospital pharmacist before discharge and the patient takes with him, or her, only those medicines that he or she needs. There is a concern about storage conditions in the patient’s home, but there always is. The storage period is usually relatively short since most medicines are only dispensed for periods of one week to three months.

The concern about sending “left-overs” from one (rich) country to another (less rich) country is that the medicines go to different patients with different prescribers, often take a long time to get there (in uncontrolled storage temperatures) and get stored for some time at the destination before being dispensed. Medicines in their original cartons should show an expiry date, but medicines that have been repacked into dispensing cartons or bottles do not show expiry dates — there is no requirement in the UK to include the expiry date on the dispensing label.

This is not a new question, but it needs to be addressed again from time to time to remind us about the problems. Drug donations have a lot of disadvantages, and recycled dispensed medicines from individual patients have more disadvantages than any other type of drug donation. Donation of the money spent in collecting and sending such donations is much better because it allows the recipients to access supplies of low-cost, good-quality drugs appropriate to their needs.

Carolyn Green
Senior Programme Officer, Care & Support,
Care & Impact Mitigation Team,
International HIV/AIDS Alliance

www.aidsalliance.org

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Dispensing errors)
Next Topic (Returned medicines)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal