Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7320 p505
9 October 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Vioxx withdrawn because of cardiovascular concerns

Merck Sharp & Dohme has announced the immediate voluntary withdrawal of Vioxx (rofecoxib). The decision is a result of concerns raised in the APPROVe (adenomatous polyp prevention in Vioxx) study, which found an increased risk of heart attack and stroke after 18 months of treatment.

All strengths and formulations of the cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitor are being withdrawn on a worldwide basis. Stocks will also be recalled from wholesalers and all clinical trials are being stopped. Limited stocks for compassionate use remain available in the short term.

“We are taking this action because we believe it best serves the interest of patients,” said Raymond Gilmartin, chairman, president and chief executive officer of MSD’s parent company Merck & Co Inc. “Although we believe it would have been possible to continue to market Vioxx with a licence that would incorporate these new data, given the availability of alternative therapies, and the questions raised by the data, we concluded that a voluntary withdrawal is the responsible course to take.”

David Pruce, director of practice and quality improvement, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, said: “Pharmacists approached by patients taking Vioxx should advise that they consult their doctor. Patients wanting to stop taking Vioxx before visiting their doctor should be offered advice on alternative painkillers. Because Vioxx is often prescribed for patients at higher risk of developing serious gastrointestinal side effects caution should be taken before recommending an over-the-counter preparation containing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.”

First authorised in 1999, Vioxx is used by an estimated 400,000 patients in the UK. It is indicated for osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and short-term pain relief. The summary of product characteristics and patient information leaflets highlight the need for caution in high risk patients, after trials suggested the possibility of additional thrombotic risk.

A major study in 2000 demonstrated an increased risk of cardiovascular events with Vioxx compared with naproxen, but other studies have not shown an increased risk compared with placebo or other NSAIDs.

The APPROVe trial studied the effect of three years of treatment with Vioxx on the recurrence of neoplastic polyps of the large bowel in 2,600 patients with a history of colorectal adenoma. After 18 months of treatment, patients taking Vioxx showed a higher rate of confirmed serious thrombotic events compared with placebo (6 versus 3 per 400 patient years).

Gordon Duff, chairman of the Committee on Safety of Medicines, said that the data are specific to rofecoxib and cannot be generalised to other COX-2 inhibitors.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal