Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7321 p559
16 October 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 80K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Adherence
· Medicines waste
· Community pharmacy
· Brand names
· Tuberculosis
· CPD
· Counterfeit medicines
· Geography


Letters to the Editor

CPD

Missing the point of CPD completely

From Mr P. J. Curphey, FRPharmS

I was astonished (not really, just incredulous) at the letter from Sultan Dajani, an elected member of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s Council (PJ, 9 October, p516).

To suggest that the complexity of one’s job dictates the complexity of one’s continuing professional development misses the point completely. Certainly keeping up to date is demanding and more continuing education may be required, but in terms of personal professional development the process is exactly the same. Has Mr Dajani learnt nothing from his time on the Council?

The process requires a reflective period to search out ways of self-development and an audit process to ensure that it is working and that you have correctly identified the shortfall. None of that negates the need to keep up to date in CE terms, which is an ethical requirement anyway.

My real concern is that there may be those who are beguiled by this lack of understanding and who believe that it is possible to have part-time pharmacists with part-time competence.

There may be those who believe that a locum pharmacist working one day a week can be different from a full-time pharmacist. Can you imagine patients being happy with that thought?

What an insult, too, to locums, to suggest that they only have to “dispense within standard operating procedures”. Where are these dangerous pharmacists? Help us all to steer clear of them!

I despair that people should think this way. No wonder the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee and others find it so hard to negotiate with our paymasters. Our own Council members are prepared to minimise the pharmacist’s key role.

If this is an attempt to engage those who are concerned about the recent rise in fees then I hope it has failed.

I have some sympathy with those for whom the increases are large, but their CPD identification, monitoring and support is the same for everyone, part-time or full-time, overseas or based in Britain.

Maybe in Mr Dajani’s part of the world locums are simply warm and breathing — there to satisfy the law. But in the real world top class locums are working their socks off and certainly my locums keep me on the straight and narrow both in professional and best practice terms.

They would be the last people to suggest that their CPD needs are any different from mine although they might both agree my CE needs brushing up.

How demoralising to realise that there are Council members who really do not understand their profession or who, after all the wrangling, have no concept of the new regulation agenda nor how times have changed.

Peter Curphey
Ballaugh Glen, Isle of Man

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Tuberculosis)
Next Topic (Counterfeit medicines)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal