|
· Concordance
· Medicines distribution
· Pharmacy education
· Management training
· Medicines stability
· New contract
· Technicians
· Prescription charge
· Personal control
· Private dispensing
· Dispensing
· Health services
· Drug delivery
· The Society
· The Journal
Letters to the Editor
|
Medicines stability
Different tests for different regions
From Dr V. L. Bull, MRPharmS
My understanding is that the International Committee on Harmonisation
(ICH) guideline on stability testing of new drug substances and products
(Q1A[R2]), as implied by Pamela
Bradshaw and Anthony Jarvis (PJ, 9 October,
p514) or directly quoted by Geoff Crumplin (ibid, p515), may have been
misinterpreted. Although the stability of medicines is tested at 40±2C/75±5
per cent relative humidity (RH), these are considered to be accelerated
conditions and, as such, are part of a battery of tests to establish
safe, long-term storage under less aggressive conditions.
For marketing in the EU, US and Japan, long-term stability needs to be
demonstrated at 25±2C/75±5 per cent RH. The guideline allows
for the fact that “significant change” may be seen under
accelerated conditions during the six-month test period, prescribing
an alternative intermediate storage condition under which testing is
to be undertaken. Thus, there is no requirement to demonstrate long-term
stability for storage at 40±2C/75±5 per cent RH.
Demonstration of long-term stability at 25±2C/75±5 per
cent RH is intended for products marketed in, as the guideline describes,
climatic zones I and II. Medicines intended for use in climatic zones
III and IV (in brief, hot and dry or hot and humid) should be tested
in accordance with ICH guideline Q1F (“Stability data package for
registration applications in climatic zones III and IV”). This
requires demonstration of long-term stability at 30±2C/65±5
per cent RH, which I presume will not be the case for most medicinal
products marketed in the UK.
Vincent Bull
Otley, West Yorkshire
|