Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7322 p598
23 October 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 90K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Concordance
· Medicines distribution
· Pharmacy education
· Management training
· Medicines stability
· New contract
· Technicians
· Prescription charge
· Personal control
· Private dispensing
· Dispensing
· Health services
· Drug delivery
· The Society
· The Journal


Letters to the Editor

Private dispensing

Customers should pay hospitals pharmacists their worth

From Mr N. P. Stidolph, MRPharmS

Irene Heywood Jones (PJ, 9 October, p524) appears to need a quick refresher course in the workings of the NHS. Basically it is a traditional socialist (ie, as opposed to “new labour”) organisation designed to provide treatment and medicines free or cheaply at the point of supply. Most medical and ancillary services became directly employed by the service.

In order to minimise costs community pharmacists were not directly employed, but carried on their commercial businesses and were thus able to charge a subsidised rate for dispensing NHS prescriptions. Hospital pharmacists were directly employed and therefore have no commercial function; provision was made, however, for hospitals to charge for dispensing services provided in conjunction with other chargeable medical services, eg, treatment of foreign diplomats etc.

Thus, while the community pharmacist is clearly in the marketplace and, since Thatcher, is forced to compete and attract custom, the hospital pharmacist has no commercial function at all.

The hospital pharmacist has many functions not falling upon his community colleague. He or she may have total parenteral nutrition to provide, ward rounds to organise, a hospital drug recognition call centre to maintain, and several technicians to keep a beady eye on. The NHS is under enough pressure keeping the queues down without encouraging rich self-important people to jump the queue. Do not say “it will only take a few minutes”! When a pharmacist is presented with an unfamiliar patient, extensive checks are required and there will be no provision for pricing at the dispensary level. I would have considered a one-off fee of £32 about right, especially when presented with a nurse with a prescription for haloperidol which she has clearly not obtained from her own GP.

Ms Heywood has three clear choices: she could queue at her own GP (this is totally free but she might have to face questions about why she is requesting this particular treatment); she could ask her consultant colleague to write her a private prescription, then go to a commercial pharmacy and pay a competitive price; or she could get her busy hospital pharmacist to drop what he is doing for her convenience and stump up what he is really worth.

N. P. Stidolph
Bognor Regis, West Sussex

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Personal control)
Next Topic (Dispensing)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal