Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7322 p598
23 October 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 90K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Concordance
· Medicines distribution
· Pharmacy education
· Management training
· Medicines stability
· New contract
· Technicians
· Prescription charge
· Personal control
· Private dispensing
· Dispensing
· Health services
· Drug delivery
· The Society
· The Journal


Letters to the Editor

Dispensing

Patient safety is being put at risk

From Mr M. L. Anderson, MRPharmS

I was extremely disappointed to read the letter from Ken Sagar, entitled “Acceptable dispensing practice?” (PJ, 2 October, p466) in which he describes receiving eight separate strips of atorvastatin tablets of varying quantities and batch numbers (indeed some with no batch numbers or expiry dates) which were dispensed to fill a prescription for 56 tablets.

This example of repackaging medicines undermines product integrity and safety and must create a most unfavourable view of the products and the profession in the eyes of the public. It is likely to lead to poor compliance because some patients will not be confident to take the medicines as prescribed. How many pharmacists would, I wonder, be happy to accept a beer from a publican if the measure was “topped up” from a number of partly used bottles?

Equally serious is the possibility of discarded original packaging being used as a conduit for counterfeit medicines entering the legitimate supply chain and the consequent risk to patients. If the profession considers it reasonable to dispense medicines in the manner described (and I am concerned that this is not uncommon) then there is, to my mind, a lack of due diligence, which ultimately puts patient safety at risk. How could a batch recall possibly operate in such cases when there are no batch numbers recorded on some of the strips?

I am well aware of the reimbursement rules which drive this behaviour but I remind fellow pharmacists of their Code of Ethics and Standards which states “pharmacists’ prime concern, irrespective of their sphere of work, must be for the wellbeing and safety of patients and the public”. I invite guidance from the Royal Pharmaceutical Society reminding members of their professional responsibilities in these matters.

Martin Anderson
Director, Commercial Affairs
Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Private dispensing)
Next Topic (Health services)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal