Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7322 p592
23 October 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary

Related websites
Dermatology links (more)


LibDems want dermatology training for pharmacists

Training proposals for pharmacists from the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Skin are seen by the Liberal Democrats as a way of improving skin care in Britain.

Speaking at a recent meeting of the group, Paul Burstow, Liberal Democrat shadow health secretary, said: “The role of the pharmacist can be particularly important as a point both of advice and referral.” Mr Burstow added that the development of distance-learning materials on skin diseases was important. He said that skin diseases affect between one in four and one in three of the population at any one time and that one in five of all GP consultations are about skin conditions, generating over 600,000 referrals to secondary care and some 60,000 inpatient episodes every year. Yet dermatology does not register on the NHS radar because the NHS is focused on mortality and cure.

“I think that we need to concentrate more on morbidity and prevention,” Mr Burstow said. He added: “It is crucial to adopt a model of care that addresses the biological, social and psychological needs of the person.”

Christine Clark, principal research fellow in clinical therapeutics at the Bradford school of pharmacy, said that pharmacists are keen to play their part. Three things are likely to enable this. One is more POM to P switches to improve access to treatment. This needs to be in tandem with the second, an expanded list of items available for independent prescribing by pharmacists because POM to P switches improve access for affluent people but not for the socially disadvantaged.

Thirdly, the community pharmacists’ contract which is framed in such a way as to reward patient care activities rather than dispensing, will also enable this.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal