Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7323 p641
30 October 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 85K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Emergency supplies
· Education
· New contract
· Agenda for change
· CPD
· Retention fees
· Boots the Chemists
· The industry
· Aqueous cream
· Overseas members


Letters to the Editor

Emergency supplies

Why should we provide services for free?

From Mr D. A. Patel, MRPharmS

I am sure there are numerous community pharmacists who have made emergency supplies of prescription only medicines to their patients. I wonder if any one has thought about being paid for such a service and how they went about it. Or have they thought better of it but provided the medicines free of charge and deducted the quantity when the required prescription was later produced, if at all. Is it because of competition down the road or fear of upsetting a “loyal” patient, or is it too much trouble to enforce an equitable charging scale and procedure?

It was a sad day when emergency supply was enabled without a suitable universal reimbursement requirement. What is incredible is why community pharmacists are not authorised to claim for such supplies from the relevant authorities. They could, for example, send one copy to such authorities, one to the patient’s doctor for record and keep a third copy for themselves. Or is this yet one more continuing free service?

Davesh Patel
Croydon, Surrey

 

STEPHEN LUTENER, head of regulation, Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee, replies:

As part of the PSNC’s work on the improvement of chemists’ terms of service, focus groups with a diverse range of contractors were organised to discuss areas where pharmaceutical services are hindered by the current regulations. The vast majority highlighted the current emergency supply provisions as being out of date, and in need of major reform.

In March, the PSNC approached the Department of Health, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society to seek amendments of the relevant legislation. Two of the improvements sought were to permit the supply of a complete month’s supply, where appropriate (and with suitable safeguards), rather than being limited to a five-day maximum, and to introduce arrangements for funding emergency supplies through the NHS. We expected the current increase in requests for emergency supplies due to the reduction in GP surgeries opening on Saturdays, and there is the potential for a further increase in requests depending on the final roll out model for electronic transfer of prescriptions.

The Society has agreed to consider our request at the November meeting of its Law and Ethics Committee, and we would welcome the Society’s support for our proposals.

Send your letter to The Editor

Next Topic (Education)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal