Home > PJ (current issue)> Contract 2005

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7323 p646
30 October 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 40K, Acrobat Reader

Contract 2005

Support for people with disabilities

In this article, part of a series about the new community pharmacy contract in England and Wales, Clare Bellingham (on the staff of The Journal) examines how pharmacists will be expected to tailor their service to provide support for people with disabilities

Contract 2005 series


Key points

1. The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 requires service providers to make reasonable adjustments to their service so that people with disabilities are able to use it

2. Providing people with disabilities support to manage and take their medicines is an essential service

3. Pharmacy staff will determine whether a patient needs the service using an assessment form that is designed for use nationally

4. The service consists of two levels. Level 1 includes making adjustments to labelling and packaging, and providing reminder charts. Level 2 is providing medicines in a compliance aid

5. Only nationally approved multi-compartment compliance aids should be used in this essential service

Some people need help in managing and taking their medicines. Providing people with disabilities with this support is an essential service in the new community pharmacy contract. In other words, it is something that all community pharmacists will have to provide.

(Other medicines support services, which could be provided for patients who do not have disabilities, fall within the enhanced tier of the contract.)

Anyone who provides any type of service is required, under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, to make reasonable adjustments to the service so that it can be used by people with disabilities. This requirement applies to community pharmacists. Most are aware that the Act requires them to make adjustments to their premises, such as providing a ramp for wheelchair access, but the Act is about much more than physical surroundings. It also requires people to provide auxiliary aids and, for pharmacy, this could include compliance aids. Furthermore, service providers cannot charge people with disabilities for these auxiliary aids.

Provision of compliance aids and other support to people with disabilities is not new for pharmacists. However, in the past, it has tended to happen in a less than uniform way. By making support for people with disabilities an essential service, it should now be provided in a systematic manner.

Service aims

The aim of the service is to support people with disabilities to manage their prescribed medicines so that they can use them safely and appropriately.

Interpreting the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act creates two main difficulties. The first is defining “disability”. The Act defines a disabled person as someone with “a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities”. It is clear that this definition includes a large number of people with a wide variety of disabilities; any long-term condition that has an impact on a person’s day-to-day life is included.

The second difficulty is defining “reasonable adjustment”. Although providing large-print labels on medicines could be classified as “reasonable” it seems unlikely that requiring all pharmacies to have the facility to print labels in Braille would be.

How the service works

Case study: a similar service

A comparable service, although not specifically for people with disabilities, is a concordance/compliance service for older people that has been running in Norfolk for nearly a year.

Ian Charles, co-ordinator of the Norfolk Medicines Support Service, explains that patients are assessed by a pharmacist or pharmacy technician. “They come up with an appropriate intervention from something simple like putting ordinary caps on bottles, popping tablets out of blister packs or providing medication reminder charts through to clinical interventions,” he says.

Many people are given monitored dosage systems or referred for assisted administration by a care worker. “There are differences between the MDS systems so it is important to ensure that patients get one that they can use,” Mr Charles explains. With all interventions, he says that pharmacists should make a choice with the patient rather than imposing a decision.

It is envisaged that the service will be initiated when a person who has a disability asks the pharmacist for assistance with managing and taking medicines. Pharmacy staff will determine the patient’s needs using an assessment form designed for use nationally. This form is currently being developed by the National Primary and Care Trust Development Programme (NatPaCT).

If requested, staff should help a patient to complete the form.

Pharmacy staff will then use a scoring method to determine whether or not the patient is eligible for support. They will also have to decide how much support the patient needs: the service includes two levels of support or, if a patient needs more extensive help, the patient should be referred to the local primary care trust for further assessment.

Completed assessment forms should be sent to the PCT. The PCT has the right to review the pharmacy’s forms and may decide that a service is inappropriate for a particular patient. If this happens, the PCT will have to tell the patient of its decision before instructing the pharmacy to stop providing the service.

The two levels of support that pharmacists can provide are:

· Level 1 which includes making adjustments to labelling and packaging, and providing reminder charts
· Level 2 is providing medicines in a compliance aid

The type of level 1 support provided will vary from patient to patient. For example, a visually impaired person might need medicines to be labelled in a more legible way, such as placing additional flagged labels on the package that use large lettering. People who have difficulty getting tablets out of blister packs, such as patients with rheumatoid arthritis, might need their medicines removed from blister packs and placed into a tablet container instead (subject to the stability of the product).

Another level 1 support is writing reminder charts to help people to remember to take their medicines. Medicines administration records could also be prepared to help people keep track of whether they have taken their medicines.

It is only if these methods fail that the use of a multi-compartment compliance aid should be considered. Patients who are eligible for a compliance aid will receive four weeks’ supply in a compliance aid at once. A nationally approved list of compliance aids is currently being drawn up and pharmacists will only be allowed to use the approved aids for this service.

Pharmacists should continue to provide the service, unless instructed by the PCT otherwise, until a review is conducted. It has not yet been decided how often reviews should take place.

There is an opportunity within the enhanced tier of the new contract — services that are commissioned locally by PCTs — to offer further medicines support services. This would allow pharmacists additionally to provide such support to people who do not have disabilities and to provide a more extensive service than is included within the essential service to anyone who requires it.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal