Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7327 p777
27 November 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


PCTs should set funds aside for public health

Hot on the heels of the public health White Paper, the All Party Parliamentary Group on Primary Care and Public Health last week wrote an open letter to a range of interested parties including the NHS Alliance, the British Medical Association, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and the royal colleges, following its own inquiry.

One focus of the letter is that PCTs should be a major part of the public health delivery system. However, speaking at the group’s annual parliamentary self-care reception in London, Stephen Hesford MP, secretary of the group, said that although PCTs are willing partners in delivery they are not always able to do what they want — getting local or community concerns right does not necessarily leave any money for public health.

“We think within the PCT budget there should be a ring-fenced budget for public health to make sure it’s not the Cinderella subject it can be or has been over the past few years,” Mr Hesford said.

The group estimate that the average PCT would need about £1m per year to ensure that appropriately trained people are in place. “I think there will be still a number of PCTs who don’t have a director of public health,” Mr Hesford added.

Also speaking at the reception, Howard Stoate MP, co-chair of the group said: “The White Paper is not legislation yet. We have plenty of mileage to carry on influencing the debate.” Dr Stoate also said that he was pleased to see pharmacy as part of the public health agenda.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal