Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7330 p880
18/25 December 2004

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 90K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Dispensing
· Levothyroxine
· CAM
· Hangovers
· CPD (2)
· The Society (2)
· The register (5)
· Retention fee (7)


Letters to the Editor

Levothyroxine

Liquid preparations should be a high priority

From Mr A. J. Nunn, FRPharmS

The method of preparing levothyroxine solution suggested by James Wells (PJ, 11 December, p852) is impractical for extemporaneous dispensing in the hospital or community pharmacy and has great potential for error if pure drug is used. The quantity of pure drug required for 100ml of solution of the strength stated is only 1mg and would require weighing of a much larger amount, measurement of aliquots from a solution and further dilution. Furthermore, no evidence of stability has been provided with the suggested method.

The recent series of letters (PJ, 6 November, p680, and 27 November, p785) about problems with oral liquid preparations of levothyroxine illustrates another aspect of the ongoing issues with medicines for children: an authorised indication and dose are available for levothyroxine but no satisfactory dosage form is marketed for babies and young children. Tan et al1 reviewing the Australian market suggest that this is the case for approximately 25 per cent of medicines intended for children. In France an oral liquid preparation of levothyroxine (L-Thyroxine Roche; 5µg per drop) is authorised for children. This preparation can be imported into the UK but why is it not authorised and marketed here?

The Department of Health and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency have recently announced a paediatric strategy to improve the availability of medicines for children and to standardise the quality of extemporaneous formulations (PJ, 21 August, p246). This will include invitations to manufacturers of appropriate preparations authorised in other European countries to register and market them in the UK. However, this may not be viable if demand is low and it may be appropriate for importation to continue, but pharmacists need to know of the availability of these medicines and both technical and patient information must be translated into English. Rationalisation of the many different formulae used in extemporaneous dispensing is to be welcomed if this also leads to evaluation of their quality, stability and bioavailability. Comparison of preparations from different commercial and NHS sources has not been undertaken. Such research should be part of the programme for the Medicines for Children Research Network, in the process of being established by the DoH, and the issues should be addressed by the NHS manufacturing review.

The recent correspondence about liquid preparations of levothyroxine suggests that this drug should be given a high priority for attention by the DoH, the MHRA and developing research networks.

Tony Nunn
Clinical Director of Pharmacy, Royal Liverpool Children’s NHS Trust

Reference

1. Tan E, Cranswick NE, Rayner CR, Chapman CB. Dosing information for paediatric patients: are they really “therapeutic orphans”? Medical Journal of Australia 2003;179:195–8.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Dispensing)
Next Topic (CAM)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal