Home > PJ (current issue) > The Society / News Centre | Search

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 273 No 7330 p890
18/25 December 2004


Society summary


Gifts of portraits of two women pharmacists

The Society is to accept gifts of portraits of two women pharmacists from the early 20th century to add to its museum portrait collection.

The offers had to be considered at the December Council meeting because portraits fall outside the Council’s agreed acquisition policy for the museum, which is restricted to proprietary medicines and material relating to the Society itself.

Vera Lord

A detail from the portrait of Vera Lord

Nicola Gray, as chairman of the Science Committee, which has responsibility for museum functions, said that the offers were unconnected but had been received at about the same time. Each portrait was offered by a great-niece of its subject. The first portrait is of Elsie Seville Hooper, who registered with the Society in 1902 and went on to be the first secretary of the (National) Association of Women Pharmacists. The second is of Vera Lord, who registered in 1915 and, although emigrating to Tasmania in the 1920s, retained her membership until her death in the 1970s.

Dr Gray said that the offers were timely in the light of the fact that the National Association of Women Pharmacists celebrates its centenary in 2005. The NAWP is believed to be the oldest professional organisation for women in existence. She added that the Society’s portrait collection currently includes only one woman and that is Jean Irvine, who was the first woman president of the Society (1947–48).

On the resource implications, Dr Gray said that one portrait would need attention from a portrait conservator but the cost could be met from the museum’s existing conservation budget.

Briony Hudson, keeper of the Society’s museum collections, said that the museum hoped to put the portraits on display next year as part of the celebration of the NAWP centenary. They would then at some point have to go into storage.

Michael Schofield said that he did not like the thought of the portraits in storage. He did not believe that no room in the building could benefit from having them.

Douglas Simpson said that there were fewer walls in the building as it moved to open plan offices. He would prefer the Society’s collections to be on open display. He also thought that the acquisitions policy was too restrictive and should be reviewed.

The President said that having portraits hung around the building allowed the Society to explain its heritage. It was an important aspect of being a professional body.

The Council agreed to accept the portraits and expressed its gratitude to the donors.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal