Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 274 No 7331 p12
1/8 January 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 85K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Drug donations
· CAM
· Pharmacy in Scotland
· Community pharmacy
· Prescribing
· Prosecution
· New contract (2)
· CPD
· Registration exam (2)
· Barcodes
· Retention fee (2)
· New Year's resolutions
· The Society
· The Journal (2)


Letters to the Editor

CAM (Complementary and alternative medicine)

Complementary medicine

Harnessing the “placebo effect”

From Professor B. L. Furman, FRPharmS

The question posed by Chris Morris (PJ, 18/25 December 2004, p880) about “the efficacy of prescribers spending more time with their patients and supplying conventional medicines” is an interesting and challenging one, not only in assessing the effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine but also when assessing conventional medicines themselves.

There is a large literature on the “placebo effect” which perhaps started with Beecher’s classic paper in 1955.1 However, it has been subsequently argued that the placebo effect may be part of a spectrum of care and treatment2 and it has been suggested that there is little evidence to support the assertion that placebos have powerful clinical effects.3 The methodological problems in estimating placebo effects have been reviewed.4 In an excellent and thought provoking review, Papakostas and Daras5 argue the case that not only placebos but also any feature of the non-specific elements of the physician-patient encounter may engender the healing response and that one should speak of “the response to the healing situation” rather than “the placebo response”. Which of the many factors (including “spending more time with their patients”, which itself probably comprises several factors) of this physician-patient encounter contribute does not appear to have been investigated. If the response to the healing situation can be understood, then it could be harnessed and incorporated into standard pharmacological and surgical treatments. This may reduce patients’ dissatisfaction with conventional medicine, while concomitantly increasing its effectiveness.5

Brian L. Furman
Dean of Science
University of Strathclyde, Glasgow

References

1. Beecher HK. The powerful placebo. JAMA 1955;159:1602–6.
2. Kienle GS, Kiene H. The powerful placebo effect: fact or fiction? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1997;50:1311–8.
3. Hrobjartsson A, Gotzsche PC. Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions. Cochrane Database Systematic Review 2004;3:CD003974.
4. Hrobjartsson A. What are the main methodological problems in the estimation of placebo effects? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2002;55:430–5.
5. Papakostas YG, Daras MD. Placebos, placebo effect, and the response to the healing situation: the evolution of a concept. Epilepsia 2001;42:1614–25.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Drug donations)
Next Topic (Pharmacy in Scotland)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal