|
Network News is produced by The Pharmaceutical Journal in association with the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's public relations and membership unit as a service to members of the Society resident in Great Britain
|

At the branch and regional secretaries’ meeting, left to right,
John Gentle, Council member Nicola Gray, Jonathan Burton and David
Morgan |
Clwyd
Involvement in the Future Branch initiative has enabled the Clwyd branch
to revitalise some of its activities and implement new activities.
Having additional funding of £3,000 in 2004 has obviously been
helpful and Clwyd has concentrated on ensuring that there is a vibrant,
local infrastructure.
A full committee was appointed at the branch annual general meeting
in January 2004. Appointments included a bilingual public relations
officer,
who has attended the Society’s media training and has been busy
establishing links with the local press. A new webmaster was appointed
and has made considerable effort in updating the branch website (www.clwydpharmacy.org.uk).
Two new sections have been added to the site – continuous professional
development (CPD) and pharmacy development groups (PDGs).
Supporting the CPD needs of branch members is a priority for Clwyd, and
initiatives are planned to inform and assist members’ understanding
of CPD and to explain that CPD is not an onerous task. A dedicated meeting
using the CPD toolkit has been arranged for January 2005.
The branch is also promoting the establishment of pharmacy development
groups (PDGs) and information about these is on the website. This is
another priority since it is important that local pharmacists (from all
sectors of practice) contribute to a pharmacy strategy/action plan. This
will inform the planning and commissioning mechanisms both the local
health board (LHB) and the trust. Pharmacist members of LHBs have been
invited by the branch to establish PDGs (with financial support being
offered by the branch).
The branch accounts have now been merged with the Society’s accounts
in what is known as unified banking. This involved closing two local
bank accounts (business and social) and transferring the funds to the
Society’s central bank. This may sound problematic and our initial
impression was one of suspicion. In practice, however, the transfer went
smoothly with no particular snags. The central banking initiative has
not meant any loss of financial independence for the branch as we still
have our own cheque book! We commend central banking for consideration
by other branches.
We hope to continue to improve the format of our thrice-yearly newsletter
and include more local features. We will endeavour to work jointly with
the Welsh Centre for Postgraduate Pharmaceutical Education, the College
of Pharmacy Practice and the neighbouring Gwynedd branch in delivering
an educational, professional and social programme to meet the needs of
members. Engaging members may be problematic but if the branch can offer
a useful programme of activities, then the future should be secured.
— David
Morgan, secretary, Clwyd branch
Shropshire
Most branch secretaries consider attendance at meetings of 10–15
per cent of the local membership to be a good result. The Shropshire
branch saw a danger of complacency setting in on achieving such a level.
The branch committee resolved to try to change this by using technology
and communications to drive their aims forward.
The branch is now in regular contact with about 40 per cent of its members
via e-mail (up from about 10 per cent a year ago) and uses every opportunity
to encourage this form of communication. For speed and ease of communication
it is unrivalled and enables the committee to have more regular contact
with members. Although not everyone yet has access to e-mail, the large
numbers who do make it possible to use this medium more and more. The
Shropshire branch continues to send traditional mailings to members on
a regular basis (stuffing envelopes is surely every branch secretary’s
favourite job) but the cost of doing so precludes the issue of monthly
mailings.
All relevant branch information is available on our website, and links
to other relevant sites fulfil an aim to make the branch a venue for
signposting members to places of interest, both pharmaceutical and other.
The information that the branch communicates to members is as important
as how often it does so. Shropshire regularly circulates Society information
that had previously only been available to branch secretaries. This will
help members to see the Society as more than just a tax collector and
policeman!
The Shropshire branch recognises that setting aside some meetings for
topics in line with ideas from the Society is a sensible thing to do.
However, the branch also values its independence. It is talking to local
pharmaceutical advisers and in 2005 will try to align some of its educational
meetings with the PCT agenda. We feel that this could boost the relevance
of some meetings in the eyes of our members leading to a rise in attendance.
The branch is breaking down perceived barriers with the local pharmaceutical
committee and it wishes to work more with other local health care organisations,
sharing costs, building bridges and raising the profile of the branch
and the profession locally.
— John Gentle, secretary, Shropshire
branch
Stirling
At the beginning of the 2003–04 branch season, the Stirling and
Central Scottish branch committee met to decide how the branch would
develop in line with other local pharmacy organisations, such as the
Scottish Centre for Post Qualification Pharmaceutical Education) and
locality development groups.
The branch had developed a successful working relationship with SCPPE
and was holding joint meetings covering clinical continuing education
topics regularly. However, it was thought that although this guaranteed
good attendance there was a risk that merging activities with other organisations
would result in loss of the branch’s identity as a distinct and
different provider of learning and networking opportunities for pharmacists.
The gaps in the market that the branch was ideally suited to deliver
on were identified as: professional development; Royal Pharmaceutical
Society issues; service development; models of practice; local peer support
(eg, for CPD); and information sharing.
It was decided that purely clinical offerings should be left to SCPPE
and local primary care/secondary care meetings. This was difficult because
such meetings are popular, but the committee decided that duplication
of other providers was not an option and the branch needed to find its
niche. It was hoped that the advent of mandatory CPD would provide an
opportunity for the branch to expand on several of the roles listed above,
particularly peer support and information sharing.
It has been a good few months for the Stirling branch and meeting topics
have covered areas such as the introduction of CPD portfolios, the Society’s
draft new Charter, the new community pharmacy contract and practical
aspects of training to be a pharmacist prescriber. Future meetings include
an interactive information technology workshop that will cover a range
of skills from basic e-mail and online CPD through to using GP practice
systems. This is the type of meeting where local colleagues will help
each other overcome hurdles to expanding their practice, building on
the theme of peer support. Only time will tell whether this new approach
is favourable for local pharmacists, but the value of trying different
approaches to enable members to get the most out of the branch cannot
be underestimated.
— Jonathan Burton, secretary, Stirling and Central
Scottish branch |