Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 274 No 7335 p145
5 February 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 100K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Nutrition
· Dispensary assistants
· Employment
· Problem-based learning
· Community pharmacy
· Morphine sulphate
· The profession
· The Society (3)
· CPD (2)
· Pharmacy practice
· We've had enough of…


Letters to the Editor

Nutrition

Pharmacists should not waste time on nutrition

From Dr S. B. Tree

I read the conference report “Choosing health” (PJ, 1/8 January, p22) with some interest and I would like to comment on two issues from the point of view of a clinical dietitian, who both practises and teaches dietetics.

I should first like to comment on the fact that the Government is to start a new campaign to raise people’s awareness of the risks of obesity. Has the Government looked at efforts to combat obesity in other countries? Here in the US, the obesity epidemic worsens in spite of numerous federal initiatives. Nutrition professionals have, for many years, debated the reasons and believe that it is caused by a number of factors, including a sedentary life-style, over-reliance on the car, an abundant supply of cheap, nutrient-sparse and fat-, sugar- and sodium-dense convenience foods and an increasing tendency to consume food prepared outside the home. None of the government-sponsored campaigns has achieved any success in the face of relentless marketing, decreased time and ability for food preparation, and the availability of cheap, processed food. In addition, many people never will do anything the government tells them to do.

Secondly, how does Pamela Mason justify a pharmacist’s role in transmitting nutrition messages to the public? Have there been any research studies on the effectiveness of this approach? Perhaps one should be undertaken. I would like to suggest that, instead of pharmacists taking on yet another burden solely because of their ready access to the public and the “insufficient numbers of dietitians”, they should concentrate on what they do best, ie, counselling on drugs and clinical medicine, instead of wasting time on delivering nutrition messages. Nutrition educators have long accepted that the delivery of knowledge (contained in messages) is the least effective method to initiate and sustain behaviour change to adopt healthy eating habits. Perhaps one of the projects the Government could undertake is examining why there is a dearth of dietitians.

In conclusion, may I share with you an anecdote from a nutrition education class I taught? The students thought that if the price of convenience foods were doubled and that of fruits and vegetables halved, it might go a fair way to halt the accelerating rise in weight.

Susan B. Tree
New York

 

PAMELA MASON states:

I agree wholeheartedly with Dr Tree — pharmacists should concentrate on providing pharmaceutical care. I am sure no one would argue with that. In providing pharmaceutical care, however, pharmacists have the opportunity and, I believe, the responsibility to deliver nutrition information. This may include advice about diet or a supplement in relation to the medicine being taken or the condition the patient has. I would also argue that pharmacists should take nutrition seriously as part of their growing public health remit. Although pharmacists should not pretend to be dietitians, I believe there is a role for them in providing and reinforcing nutritional advice in the context of pharmaceutical care. And, yes, we do need some good quality studies to show whether or not such activity is effective as one of many methods, including price policies, for encouraging better dietary habits in the population.

Send your letter to The Editor

Next Topic (Dispensary assistants)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal