Home > PJ (current issue)> Articles

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 274 No 7341 p338
19 March 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 40K, Acrobat Reader

Articles

Supplementary prescribing can be adapted to improve discharge planning

In this article the authors describe their experience in adapting supplementary prescribing to the discharge process in a cardiac unit


Mohamed Elfellah, PhD, MRPharmS, is clinical cardiovascular pharmacist

Graham S. Hillis, MB ChB, is senior lecturer in cardiology

Brian Jappy, MSc, MRPharmS, is chief pharmacist, at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary.

Correspondence to:
Dr Elfella
e-mail mohamed.elfellah@arh.grampian.scot.nhs.uk

Clinical management plan

The clinical management plan is an essential component of supplementary prescribing. It must be agreed by the independent prescriber, the supplementary prescriber and the patient. It is based on a generic treatment plan and contains the patient’s name, date of birth and identification numbers, the name of the independent and supplementary prescriber, and the diagnosis. It also contains reference to the guidelines or protocols supporting the treatment plan, details regarding monitoring and confirmation of the patient’s verbal consent, with the date. (As yet we have not faced a situation where a patient is unable to give consent. Were we to, approval of the next of kin would be sought.)

Supplementary prescribing has mainly been adopted in primary care and in outpatient clinics. There is, however, increasing interest in its application in secondary care. We have adapted supplementary prescribing to the discharge process in the cardiac unit at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary. As a result, the pharmacist’s role has changed. It is expected that these changes will improve patient care.

Our previous work has demonstrated that review of the discharge prescription at ARI by the ward clinical pharmacist reduced errors, decreased waiting times for discharge medicines and minimised medicines wastage.1 This has led to a change in cardiac ward practice, whereby the clinical pharmacist now writes 80 to 90 per cent of discharge prescriptions. Such practice is encouraged at ARI because it is seen to reduce junior doctors’ workload, speed up patient discharge and increase bed turnover. Work from other hospitals has reached comparable conclusions.2

One problem, however, persists: a doctor must sign the discharge prescription before it is sent to the pharmacy for dispensing. This can lead to delays and duplication of work. Some hospitals have tried to overcome this problem by dispensing directly from the in-patient drug prescription, but this system has not been widely accepted.2

The aim of supplementary prescribing (ie, by prescribers other than doctors) is to provide patients with quicker and more efficient access to medicines, and to make the best use of skilled trained nurses and pharmacists. Over time, supplementary prescribing is also likely to reduce doctors’ workloads, freeing their time to concentrate on patients with more complex treatments.

In Scotland, the main role of supplementary prescribing has been in the management of chronically ill patients in primary care. However, pharmacists entrusted with the discharge planning of patients in acute services have similar goals to those in primary care. Supplementary prescribing, therefore, offers hospital pharmacists a historic opportunity.

In our unit, we have used the autonomy offered to supplementary prescribers to begin prescribing drugs for cardiovascular and some other specified conditions. Using protocols and guidelines which are already in place in the cardiac unit, we produced a clinical management plan which was approved by the supplementary prescribing committee in NHS Grampian (copies available on request). They were written and approved by both the supplementary prescriber and local consultants. Agreements are also in place for treatment plans for non-cardiac conditions. They are used as a basis for prescribing during admission and on discharge.

Daily monitoring of treatment is carried out by the pharmacist and the independent prescriber throughout the patient’s hospital stay. Once a date for discharge is set, the pharmacist supplementary prescriber writes the discharge prescription, usually at the patient’s bedside, where drug history is confirmed. Diagnoses and past medical history are recorded in the discharge report from the medical notes. Discharge medicines are prescribed with reference not only to the inpatient prescription, but also taking into consideration the prior clinical and drug history. Medicines that are no longer required are omitted on discharge. Optimising therapy on discharge may involve alteration of dosages (for example, titrating angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and adjusting doses of warfarin) and adding medicines that are appropriate for the condition (for example, aspirin, a beta-blocker and a statin following myocardial infarction). Any changes made by the supplementary prescribing pharmacist are based on agreed protocols and guidelines. Medicines prescribed before or during admission and not covered by the agreed protocols are transcribed from the inpatient prescription. Major changes are recorded in the medical notes of the patient. The discharge report, together with the CMP, is then sent to the pharmacy to be dispensed. The pharmacy dispenses the discharge drugs against the signature of the supplementary prescriber and sends a copy of the discharge report together with the CMP for filing in the medical notes of the patient. From March 2004 to January 2005, the supplementary prescriber wrote 825 discharge prescriptions on the cardiac ward. This was equivalent to approximately 80 per cent of total prescriptions written there.

The CMP is a useful document to assist the supplementary prescriber when running a clinic for chronic disease. The situation is different in hospital, where the pharmacist is a member of a team caring for the patient daily and where the medical notes and the inpatient prescription are easily accessible. In addition, most of the information contained in the CMP is also written in the discharge report. Therefore, in secondary care the CMP is a somewhat repetitive document. In this setting its main function is to fulfil the legal requirements for supplementary prescribing.

Supplementary prescribing increases the accountability of the pharmacist: transforming them from a prescribing adviser to a prescriber. It also adds to the workload of the pharmacist. Nevertheless, it does create a unique opportunity for hospital clinical pharmacists. Their knowledge and experience places them in an excellent position to prescribe not just for single but for multiple conditions and illnesses. This should strengthen the role of the pharmacist as an important member of the health care team. Moreover, taking this responsibility may facilitate the discharge process and improve communication with colleagues in primary care. Most importantly, these changes should improve patient care. Further work is required to verify and quantify these benefits, thereby ensuring the full potential of the hospital supplementary prescriber is realised.


References

1. Elfellah MS, Jappy B. Outcomes following discharge prescription monitoring by the ward pharmacist. Pharmaceutical Journal 1996;257:156.
2. Hobson RJ, Sewell GJ. UK survey of discharge prescriptions, transcribing and development of hospital pharmacist prescribing role. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2002;10(Suppl):R12 PDF (50K)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal