Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 274 No 7343 p381
2 April 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


IVAX follows GSK lead on revised discount terms

Drug manufacturer IVAX has followed GlaxoSmithKline and revised its discount terms for community pharmacies. In a statement, IVAX Pharmaceuticals UK said the decision was taken reluctantly but “the new market dynamics imposed on us all” by GSK’s decision left it with little option.

IVAX removed the discount from three of its respiratory brands — Qvar, Airomir and EasiBreathe on 1 April. These are in direct competition with some GSK products which also had their discount removed from 1 April.

But IVAX said that to help compensate pharmacists for any loss of income it was introducing a price cut of up to 48 per cent on other drugs in its respiratory portfolio.

The announcement has alarmed some pharmacist leaders who fear the removal of discounts could affect the funding of the new community pharmacy contracts, which takes discounts into account.

However, the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee has reassured pharmacists that they will not be out of pocket following the decisions by GSK and IVAX.

Mike Dent

Mike Dent: pharmacist should not be out of pocket

Head of finance at the PSNC Mike Dent said: “The Government has guaranteed the £1.766bn for the new contract. That is the key message we would like to get across and that includes £500m of guaranteed buying profit.” He confirmed that the Government has promised to make up any shortfall in funding created by the removal of drug discounts and added: “But we are still deciding about the mechanism.”

Commenting on the IVAX announcement Frank Owens, chairman of the Scottish Pharmaceutical General Council, said: “The GSK decision was completely unexpected but having said that I think the IVAX announcement was inevitable. Pharmacists are going to end up the innocent victims — caught in the middle of an escalating conflict between drug manufacturers.”

The SPGC standing committee has asked GSK to reconsider its decision but so far has had no response.

Mr Owens said: “If they continue to go down this road, health administrations and pharmacy negotiators will have to direct their attention away from implementing the new contract to reimbursement issues.”

John D’Arcy, chief executive of the National Pharmaceutical Association, said: “Both companies are riding on the back of an agreement to keep money in the system. That is a pretty major assumption and only time will tell whether the Government will bail people out or that the money will still stay in the system. The problem will come if everybody takes discounts out. Then where will that money come from?”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal