Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 274 No 7343 p382
2 April 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Aspirin safer than warfarin and as effective for reducing stroke risk from blocked arteries

High-dose aspirin is as effective as warfarin for reducing the risk of stroke following intracranial stenosis (partial blockage of arteries in the brain) and is associated with fewer side effects, a randomised trial has revealed.

US researchers compared use of warfarin (target international normalised ratio 2.0–3.0) with aspirin (1,300mg daily) in 569 patients for an average of 1.8 years. All the patients had a greater than 50 per cent blockage of a major intracranial artery and had experienced a transient ischaemic attack or non-disabling stroke within the 90 days before study enrolment. About 22 per cent of the patients had a subsequent ischaemic stroke or brain haemorrhage, or died from other blood vessel-related causes, regardless of whether they received aspirin or warfarin.

However, the rates of major haemorrhage and death from all causes were higher for patients treated with warfarin (event rates for aspirin compared with warfarin were 3.2 per cent vs 8.3 per cent for major haemorrhage and 4.3 per cent vs 9.7 per cent for death).

“This trial is good news. A simple low-cost drug works just as well as one that requires complicated and expensive monitoring and dose adjustments,” said John Marler, associate director for clinical trials at the US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, which funded the study.

The researchers say the use of such a high dose of aspirin in the trial was justified because no other doses have been reliably tested in intracranial stenosis (New England Journal of Medicine 2005;352:1305).

In an accompanying editorial, Walter Koroshetz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, points out that the INR target was reached in less than 63 per cent of patients treated with warfarin and suggests that the delay in achieving a therapeutic level of anticoagulation might have contributed to the failure of warfarin (ibid, p1368).

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal