Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 274 No 7346 p490
23 April 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 100K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Council election (10)
· Statutory Committee (2)
· Herbal medicines
· Technicians (2)
· Obesity
· GlaxoSmithKline
· CPD (2)
· The profession
· Registration fees (2)


Letters to the Editor

Technicians

Disappointing divide between pharmacists and technicians (Mr A. Young and Miss J. Cant)

Can pharmacists not see what is in front of their faces? (Ms J. Bayley)

Disappointing divide between pharmacists and technicians

From Mr A. Young, MRPharmS, and Miss J. Cant

We write in response to several letters that have appeared in recent issues. It seems a divide is growing between pharmacists and technicians. This is a disappointing attitude to have, especially at a time when both pharmacists’ and technicians’ roles are expanding.

At the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, pharmacists and technicians work together to provide excellent pharmaceutical care. Each team member has skills that can be brought to the bedside to benefit patients. Working in the NHS should not be about trying to outdo other members of the health care team but about adopting a skill mix so that we fully use each other’s skills in an appropriate way.

Our roles were created when the National Service Framework for Older People was published. We work together to implement pharmaceutical care across the older persons directorate. The pharmacist’s role is to complete a medication review for each patient and to offer clinical advice to all members of the multidisciplinary team. Using specifically designed tools, the technician assesses each patient to see whether he or she can safely administer his or her own medicines. The pharmacist and technician then meet to decide the way forward for the patient to enable a safe discharge in terms of medication. A discharge goal is then set. This outlines the action needed before a patient can be discharged, for example, providing a compliance aid, a medication reminder chart or simple counselling. It is also possible to place patients on a programme of target-based self-administration where, through prompting or supervision by nursing staff, it is ensured that patients can take their medicines safely. In our view, a patient’s ability to self-medicate safely is just as important as their ability to walk up the stairs or to put the kettle on.

At the time of discharge the technician produces electronically a medication reminder chart using a drug database designed by the pharmacist, and counsels the patient. The pharmacist prepares the electronic discharge prescription and an electronic discharge letter, detailing any medication issues, such as dose changes. This also details any medication-related tests required and all compliance issues.

In conclusion, the services offered by a pharmacy team should be patient-centred and work for the benefit of the patient. As long as team members work within their areas of competence, why should it matter who does which job?

Anthony Young
Older Persons Pharmacist

Joanne Cant
Older Persons Technician
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Gateshead Health Foundation Trust, Gateshead


Can pharmacists not see what is in front of their faces?

From Ms J. Bayley

I am sure I am not the only pharmacy technician to be concerned at the way pharmacists seem to think that we should remain in the dispensary “pill pushing”. Some pharmacists like Andrew Pothecary (PJ, 9 April, p421), seem to think that technicians only qualify to do the work pharmacists do not want to do.

I have been a technician for 20 years and I have a greater knowledge and more work experience than a pharmacist who has just qualified. Why, then, should I not explore new roles? Mr Pothecary says that technicians should not be permitted to run clinics or to deal with issues in a clinical setting because they do not have the clinical knowledge needed to deal with patients. I am sure I speak for all technicians when I say that none of us would counsel patients or answer queries from patients without having the knowledge to do so, whereas I have heard newly qualified pharmacists bluffing their way through queries. I would like to see data that suggest that technicians cannot do the job as well as a pharmacist.

Finally, he mentions prescribing support technicians. I am a medicines management technician in a local primary care trust and I contribute a great deal to better prescribing from our GPs. If there were no technicians working hard to reduce spending and increase better prescribing PCTs would not have the money to spend on the new pharmacy contract, including enhanced and additional services.

I am upset that there are pharmacists who just do not see what they have in front of their faces and how technicians can help in many areas other than just dispensing.

Jackie Bayley
Medicines Management Technician
Moorlands Primary Care Trust

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Herbal medicines)
Next Topic (Obesity)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal