| · Dispensing doctors
· Council election (5)
· GlaxoSmithKline
· Statins
· Salamol
· Supervision
· The Society
· The Journal
Letters to the Editor
|
The Society
DoH circulars are wasted on non-practising pharmacists
From Mr E. P. Crabtree, MRPharmS
I recently received a circular from the Department of Health regarding “Pneumococcal
immunisation of older people and risk groups”. Since I am a non-practising
(I prefer “retired”) pharmacist, I am at a loss to know what
I am supposed to do with this information. Yet apparently my name and
address were put on the list of recipients by the Royal Pharmaceutical
Society.
It seems to me that putting non-practising pharmacists on the DoH list
just results in a waste of public money.
Philip Crabtree
Huddersfield
| |
PHILIP GREEN, deputy secretary and registrar, Royal Pharmaceutical
Society, replies:
I welcome this feedback. It is early days for the
two-part Register.
We could restrict the mailing list for items such as professional
communications, safety notices, etc, from the government to the practising
part of the
Register. However, not all those members on the non-practising part
are permanently retired and, indeed, not all the permanently retired
will
wish to be excluded from sources of information. Some like to read
and write to The Pharmaceutical Journal, for example. Moreover, many
on
the non-practising part of the Register are on maternity leave or
career breaks
and may find such information will help ensure they are not unaware
of something they may need to know when they return to practice. This
is
the only comment we have received on this matter and we would be interested
in other views — for or against. |
|