Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 274 No 7349 p584
14 May 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 100K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· The Society (9)
· Birdsgrove House
· Reciprocal registration
· NAWP (2)
· Pharmacy technicians
· Community pharmacy
· Statutory Committee
· Internet sites
· Complementary medicine
· Pharmacy graduates
· RFID pilot
· CPD


Letters to the Editor

RFID pilot

Radio-frequency identification will support pharmacists’ decisions

From Ms A. Williams

In 2004, counterfeit medicines reached UK patients through the legal supply chain on two separate occasions. It is not true that authentication at the point of dispensing is a solution looking for a problem (PJ, 19 March, p330).

The concern is that these incidents may be the tip of the iceberg. Currently no mechanism is in place to identify the full extent of fraud. We do know that globally fraudulent medicines (including counterfeits) are costing industry $30bn per annum. Recently, EU accession has widened borders to countries where there are known and significant problems of counterfeit medicines. Latest estimates suggest that global losses will rise to $68 billion by 2009. Producing counterfeit medicines is big business. The problem is not going to go away and directly affects patient safety.

In health care, prevention is often better than cure and this situation is no different. Preventing the problem from reaching areas where the prevalence is believed to be low, such as the UK, is worthwhile. With EU legislation encouraging the free movement of goods, it is only a matter of time before we see increasing levels of illegal medicines in the UK.

With regard to Ian Shepherd’s concern relating to accuracy, like any other large scale IT-based system the radio-frequency identification system must be fully auditable, accurate and secure. Working with organisations such as the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, the NHS and GS1UK, it will be Aegate’s responsibility to ensure it is. One overriding principle is that the system is designed to be fail-safe (ie, it will err on the side of caution and fail to authenticate if there is an anomaly, rather than give a false positive response). This was fully tested in the pilot and shown to be 100 per cent accurate. It will never be the intention to provide a system that replaces a pharmacists’ professional judgement to dispense, but to support their decisions by providing better information than they have today.

Alison Williams
Director, Aegate Ltd

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Pharmacy graduates)
Next Topic (Continuing professional development)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal