Home > PJ (current issue)> Articles

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 274 No 7350 p621
21 May 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 70K, Acrobat Reader

Articles

June FACT: CAM — a challenge or an opportunity for pharmacists?

Research published in the June issue of Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies is highlighted by Natalie Lane


Natalie Lane is production editor, journals, with the Pharmaceutical Press, the publishing arm of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society

Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies

What is FACT?

Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies (FACT), edited by Edzard Ernst (Laing Chair in Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth) is an evidence-based journal that is a single point of reference for current information on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) from around the world. Current literature is summarised and commented on by members of the FACT international editorial board, reviewing topics as diverse as herbal medicines, vitamins, minerals and supplements, homoeopathy, acupuncture and manipulative therapies, and giving readers a concise and objective view of the value of such therapies currently available. FACT also contains news, short reports, focus articles and debates on CAM.

The full text of FACT is available by subscription and is now available online

Heather Boon, assistant professor at the Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, discusses the increased use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in a guest editorial. She also wonders whether CAM products provide an opportunity or a challenge for pharmacists. With the increased use of CAM, pharmacists “appear to be in a good position to provide patients with evidence-based information”, particularly regarding the potential interactions with conventional medicine. Pharmacists are also potentially able to help patients make a safe choice about CAM products, although many pharmacists have limited ability when it comes to achieving this. A varying level of content and discussion about CAM in pharmacy schools has resulted in pharmacists practising with different degrees of knowledge and competency.

The responsibility of pharmacists to detect and prevent interactions between CAM products and conventional medicine is consistently recognised as important. The editorial highlights several calls for pharmacists to have more knowledge about CAM products, with one document suggesting “that providing care to patients (many of whom are considering the use of CAM products) means that the pharmacist must assume an active role in this area of practice”. These reports assume a level of agreement by pharmacists regarding CAM and pharmacy; yet evidence is also shown that pharmacists do not accept herbal medicines. One Canadian study reported that only 2 per cent of pharmacists believed that they had adequate information about complementary and alternative health care.

The editorial concludes that the pharmacy profession can no longer ignore the widespread use of CAM products by patients, and if pharmacies sell CAM products, pharmacists must have sufficient knowledge to ensure they help consumers and patients. Undergraduate pharmacy students need to be actively educated, and practising pharmacists should be provided with additional training.

Supplementary diabetes treatment

To evaluate the supplementation of pycnogenol, a Pinus pinaster (French maritime pine) bark extract, to the usual treatment for type II diabetes, 77 participants in China received 100mg of pycnogenol, or a placebo for 12 weeks. Significant improvement was found in plasma glucose levels on multiple occasions, and positive effects noted in several metabolic parameters. The authors concluded that the supplementation of pycnogenol “lowers glucose levels and improves endothelial function”.

FACT suggests that the clinical trial and accompanying article were produced quickly so as to confirm a set of beliefs rather than test a hypothesis. There are several details that the commentary suggests are missing from the clinical trial such as: “How did the authors decide on the number of subjects to enrol?” and “How did they prepare the placebo and how did it compare to the pycnogenol?”. The authors have replied to such details. They also note that this was the first study to test lowering blood glucose in diabetic patients and, therefore, there were no data to assist them.

FACT comments that pycnogenol is a fascinating substance and has the potential to improve the health of type II diabetes patients. However, it is difficult to draw conclusions from the data provided.

AGE and coronary heart disease

In a pilot randomised controlled trial, participants with known coronary artery disease or at high risk from such disease in Los Angeles, were on stable courses of a statin drug and aspirin. The participants took 4ml of aged garlic extract (AGE) or a placebo daily for one year. The results of absolute changes and percentage change per year were measured by electron beam tomography using two different calculations: the Agatson calcium score and a volumetric calcium score. The results showed less progression of the volumetric calcium score per year for the AGE group than for the placebo group, thus indicating the potential of AGE to inhibit the rate of progression of coronary calcification. The authors noted the incremental benefit of the garlic over the statin drugs, and larger studies should be conducted to confirm this finding.

FACT discusses how this trial is well designed, executed and reported. Participants were educated about a low cholesterol diet, were on a stable regimen of statin drug plus aspirin, and were warned against consuming garlic products. Participants were also tested quarterly for S-allylcysteine, an active compound of AGE, which provided confirmation of compliance with the trial. All these measures increased the reliability of the results.

The commentary notes a minor criticism concerning the lack of a power calculation. This is relevant where the calculation of the volumetric calcium score showed a difference between groups while the Agatson score did not. FACT also highlights the need for all trials of herbs to document the constituents of the products, and this trial makes a first step by reporting the method of extraction.

In summary, however, FACT praises the authors for identifying the incremental benefit of AGE in relation to statin therapy, and for showing the “positive results that AGE slows progression of atherosclerosis without overstating the findings from their study”.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal