Home > PJ (current issue)> Interview
|
This article |
What will elected technicians bring to the reformed Council’s deliberations? |
|
Next week, the new Council, with its 17 pharmacists, 10 lay members, one academic appointment and two pharmacy technicians, will officially take over from the existing Council. Dawn Connelly (on the staff of The Journal) interviews technician Lesley Morgan, to find out about her expectations of serving on the Council |
Lesley Morgan has had a long and varied career involving most sectors
of the pharmacy profession. And this, she believes, is something that
will help her in her role as one of two technicians elected to the Royal
Pharmaceutical Society’s reformed Council. Well qualified She went on to gain various management and training qualifications,
including a master’s in education. In 1989, she became a member of the
Society’s first working party on education and training of certified
support staff, and she currently sits on the Society’s support
staff regulation steering group. In 1998 she was awarded an MBE for
her services to pharmaceutical education in Wales. Important issues The issues that are important to Mrs Morgan stem from her interest
in education and training, and standards of practice. Her prime concern
is that training should be of a nationally high standard. “The
underpinning knowledge for baseline entry to the register of technicians
needs a robust quality assurance system to ensure standardisation across
Great Britain,” she says. She explains that technicians need
to obtain Scottish/National Vocational Qualification Level 3 Pharmacy
Services in order to register with the Society, and this requires proof
of underpinning knowledge and work-based experience. It has not yet
been decided how the quality of underpinning knowledge programmes can
be monitored, she says. Future role of technicians Mrs Morgan would like to see community pharmacy technicians’ careers developing in a similar way to those of hospital technicians. “I think there are opportunities in the new contract but there are issues that need to be clarified,” she says, specifically, whether pharmacists can delegate certain tasks to technicians. “The new contract seems to be saying ‘Pharmacists can provide this service or that service’ but it is not clear what roles can be delegated in delivering that service,” she says. For example, she believes that technicians in the community could play a role in medicines use reviews in the same way that technicians in hospitals are involved in medicines management. Although she acknowledges that technicians do not possess the clinical skills to carry out medicines use reviews independently, she believes they are well equipped to gather information from patients about their medicines and identify issues with compliance. This information could then be passed on to the pharmacist. “It would entail a sort of triage system. This would save pharmacists’ time because they would already have the baseline data to start thinking about the clinical issues,” she suggests. It all comes down to better use of skill mix, she says. She adds that, as with S/NVQ 3, a national standard is needed to ensure that technicians are supported by appropriate training to carry out these extended roles. Anticipation … Mrs Morgan is looking forward to being able to contribute to the future
direction of the profession through her role on the Council. “I
want to be able to influence policy in a constructive way and to move
pharmacy forward. If I feel that I have done that, then it will be
worthwhile,” she says. |