Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 274 No 7351 p646-647
28 May 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 80K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Prescribing
· Dispensing doctors
· Information systems
· Adverse event reporting (2)
· Pharmacy graduates
· New contract
· Pharmacy technicians
· Community pharmacy
· Birdsgrove House (2)
· Reciprocal registration


Letters to the Editor

Community pharmacy

Pharmacists are not trained for and do not want public health jobs

From Mr J. B. Paige, MRPharmS

Several of your recent correspondents have suggested that the pharmacist members of the new Council of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society will pursue sectional interests because they are community pharmacists. This is an unfounded allegation on the successful candidates and one which I find deeply insulting.

What really makes this Council different from its predecessors is that it is made up of a balance of lay members and ordinary working pharmacists without any nominees of employer organisations.

Most pharmacists have always put the care of their clients before their own interests. This has allowed them to be exploited by the accountants, administrators and politicians who control most pharmacy employers in all sectors. Even now, Jim Smith, chief pharmacist for England, is trying to get pharmacists to take on tasks that no one else in the NHS wants, without offering realistic funding for the extra work involved.

As one who voted for the Save Our Society candidates, I hope to see the Council press for pharmacists to be allowed to use the education and experience they have gained to bring the greatest possible benefit to the patients they serve.

New duties should relate to the manufacture, distribution, supply, use and safety of medicines. Public health education, diagnostic testing, etc, are not jobs we want or are trained to do.

Barrie Paige
Guernsey, Channel Islands

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Pharmacy technicians)
Next Topic (Birdsgrove House)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal