Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 274 No 7351 p636
28 May 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Society’s striking-off decision is upheld by the High Court

Two pharmacists who launched a hate campaign against a wholesaler were rightly ordered to be struck off the Register of Pharmaceutical Chemists, the High Court has ruled (PJ, 26 February, p252).

Mr Justice Newman said that Christopher and Jane Chanin’s campaign against Unichem Ltd was highly offensive, threatening and abusive and that the decision to strike them off was entirely justified.

The Chanins, of Whinmoor Close, Prenton, Merseyside, used images of the Grim Reaper and referred to Exocet missiles and the Vietcong during a financial dispute with Unichem.

In October last year the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s Statutory Committee ruled that they had brought the profession into disrepute and ordered that their names be erased from the Register.

The judge said that he was unimpressed with a suggestion that these communications did not amount to abusive and threatening conduct of a serious nature. Their previous good standing and community support were only of limited relevance. Their behaviour plainly justified erasure and the Society’s duty to protect the reputation of the profession took priority over any personal mitigation they had put forward.

Dismissing the couple’s appeal, ordering them to pay the Society’s legal costs and upholding the decision to strike them off, the judge concluded: “In my judgment, no other penalty would have been appropriate.”

The Chanins’ names were removed from the Register immediately after the ruling on 23 May (see p664). A spokesman for the Chanins said that the case would now be taken to the European Court of Human Rights.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal