Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 274 No 7352 p676
4 June 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 80K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Medication review
· Clinical trials
· The Council
· Annual general meeting
· Pharmacology
· General election
· Technicians
· Ischaemic events
· Complementary therapies (2)


Letters to the Editor

Annual general meeting

AGM reports

Wrong impression

From Mr J. E. Balmford, FRPharmS, and Mr I. M. Caldwell, FRPharmS

We would like to correct the wrong impression given by your headline “AGM calls for the establishment of three new Society committees” (PJ, 28 May, p661).

The motion we proposed, and which was carried by the meeting, was to establish a group of members to consider the activities of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society; such a group would not be a committee of the Council. The whole purpose of our motion was that the group would be directly elected by the membership, in a way similar to how the honorary auditors have been elected in the past, ie, completely independent of the Council.

John E. Balmford
Ian M. Caldwell

Past Presidents
Royal Pharmaceutical Society

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (The Council)
Next Topic (Pharmacology)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal