Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 274 No 7352 p677
4 June 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 80K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Medication review
· Clinical trials
· The Council
· Annual general meeting
· Pharmacology
· General election
· Technicians
· Ischaemic events
· Complementary therapies (2)


Letters to the Editor

General election

Not disappointed

From Mr D. Wood, MRPharmS

As you rightly say in a news item (PJ, 14 May, p572), I did lose my deposit in Barnsley Central in the general election, but I was far from disappointed by my result.

It was my first attempt and I received 1,175 votes. I helped to reduce the New Labour majority by 2,500 votes. In eight years, it has dropped from 24,501 to 12,732 — which is quite a change for Barnsley. A “national figure” — Robert Kilroy Silk — only managed just over 2,000 votes and Arthur Scargill’s Labour Socialist Party, only managed 740 votes in Barnsley East.

Six years ago I was the first independent candidate to stand in a local election in Barnsley, when the opposition was three out of a council of 66 members. I did not get elected, but that does not matter. Now the opposition is 23 out of 63 so I did start the ball rolling for change.

Donald Wood
Barnsley, South Yorkshire

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Pharmacology)
Next Topic (Technicians)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal