Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 274 No 7352 p677
4 June 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 80K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Medication review
· Clinical trials
· The Council
· Annual general meeting
· Pharmacology
· General election
· Technicians
· Ischaemic events
· Complementary therapies (2)


Letters to the Editor

Technicians

Society refuses to recognise qualification

From Ms D. Reece

After deciding to work in pharmacy on finishing my A levels, I joined Boots The Chemists. This was in 1994. I qualified as a health care assistant in 1995 and when the opportunity came up to train as a technician, I jumped at the chance. I qualified in May 1996 and have never looked back.

Since qualifying, I have worked in community, NHS hospitals, private hospitals and industry, as well as in locum positions for a short period. I have only been asked once about not having a hospital qualification (at my first job after leaving Boots) and was offered a conversion course to obtain the NVQ. I started this, then the funding disappeared. I was assured that I had proven myself and it would no longer be a problem. This was back in 1998.

I have now progressed further and am happy in my role as a MTO4+++. On attempting to register with the Royal Pharmaceutical Society a few months ago, I was told that my qualification and experience are not valid to register as a technician and I must re-train. This is not what I wanted to hear.

Boots has written a conversion course, which apparently only applies to those still working in a community environment, so this is not helpful. I am studying management in my spare time after work, so time to retrain or do NVQ modules in between is not feasible.

The idea of me being penalised on a qualification I attained in 1996 is ludicrous. Had I known then that I would be in this position, I would not have undertaken that training.

I have also been advised by the Association of Pharmacy Technicians that I should be able to go via the grandparent route, but the response I have had so far from the Society is contrary to this.

I would be interested to hear from anybody else in a similar situation (dawn.reece@uclh.org), since I am sure that I cannot be the only one with this problem.

Dawn Reece
Pharmacy Distribution Services Manager,
University College Hospitals London

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (General election)
Next Topic (Ischaemic events)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal