Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 274 No 7354 p760
18 June 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 80K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· CPD
· CPPE
· Reciprocity
· Prescribing
· The Society
· Technicians


Letters to the Editor

Prescribing

Did PJ misreport NICE guidance?

From Mr N. J. Staunton, MRPharmS

A recent PJ news feature covered the Health Select Committee’s report on the pharmaceutical industry (PJ, 30 April, p514). I enjoyed reading this concise report of the lengthy select committee paper. The report included good advice from the well respected National Prescribing Centre, which directed criticism at both pharmaceutical companies and the media for misrepresenting information on drugs.

I was therefore rather surprised to read a news item in the PJ just four weeks later which seems to misrepresent recent National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidance (PJ, 28 May, p641). The PJ news headline states “NICE restricts clopidogrel and dipyridamole”. NICE guidance actually clearly differentiates between clopidogrel and dipyridamole in combination with aspirin and says: “The combination of modified-release (MR) dipyridamole and aspirin is recommended for people who have had an ischaemic stroke or a transient ischaemic attack for a period of two years from the most recent event.” In contrast, NICE states: “Clopidogrel alone (within its licensed indications) is recommended for people who are intolerant of low-dose aspirin and either have experienced an occlusive vascular event or have symptomatic peripheral arterial disease.”1

NICE actually goes on to estimate an increase in sales of MR dipyridamole and aspirin from £2.6m in 2003 to anything between £10.1 and £11.9m in the first year, with a decrease in sales of clopidogrel from £86.8m in 2003 to between £7.6m and £25.2m (although NICE does point out that it is not clear exactly how much of the £86.8m is spent on which indications).

Might I respectfully suggest that the PJ takes its own advice and reports objectively and accurately on important issues such as NICE guidance in future?

Noel Staunton
Isle of Wight

Reference

1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guidance on vascular disease — clopidogrel and dipyridamole No 90 — May 2005. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2005.

 

The guidance to which Mr Staunton refers relates to the prevention of occlusive vascular events and makes recommendations about use of clopidogrel and modified-release dipyridamole. Clopigogrel (Plavix) is licensed for prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients suffering from myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke or established arterial disease. MR dipyridamole is licensed for secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attacks either alone (Persantin Retard) or in conjunction with aspirin (Asasantin Retard). NICE restricts use of clopidogrel to only those patients who cannot tolerate aspirin. It also restricts the use of MR dipyridamole to use with aspirin and also for a period of two years post event. The Scottish Medicines Consortium, an organisation with functions similar to those of NICE, uses the term “restricted use” whenever it makes recommendations that limit use compared with the licensed indications for a drug
EDITOR

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Reciprocity)
Next Topic (The Society)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal