Home > PJ (current issue) > Leading article | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 274 No 7355 p780
25 June 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 50K, Acrobat Reader

Leading Article

Patterns in recruitment

Subtle changes in the patterns of pharmacist recruitment are beginning to be seen, according to The Journal’s annual Special feature (PDF 380K) examining the market (p793). Concerns are being raised that the changes to the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s Register and the increase in fees are having some impact, as well as a reluctance for pharmacists in hospital to move to new posts until they understand the implications of Agenda for Change.

In community pharmacy one effect is that more locums are seeking permanent posts, possibly tempted by employers’ willingness to pay pharmacists’ retention fees. However, locum agencies are being innovative in their efforts to attract and retain locums. As reported previously (PJ, 21 May, p603) agencies are now devising loyalty schemes that enable locums to earn points for every hour they work that can be put towards paying the retention fee, among other benefits.

These reports, however, are anecdotal and it is difficult to gauge whether or not the shifting patterns are national or local and only a feature of 2005. Moreover, there have been shortages of pharmacists in different parts of the country for many years and this year’s picture may be little more than a variation on a theme.

In the hospital sector, problems are still being experienced. In addition to the stagnation seen while Agenda for Change banding decisions are made, there remain many vacancies for pharmacists — possibly a reflection of the “fallow year” when the pharmacy degree course was extended to four years.

However, in the long term hospital recruitment may have been given something of a boost through because of the development of consultant pharmacy posts. In a Vision for pharmacy (p797 PDF (140K)) The Journal visited one foundation hospital trust that has no less than three consultant pharmacists in post. What is clearly exciting about these appointments is that the pharmacists involved are practising as clinicians at the limits of their experience and knowledge.

As a model for hospital pharmacy in the future, one can imagine the benefits of this sort of structure being felt in the lower rungs of the career ladder. Being part of a department that does not entail having to relinquish clinical work and join the management team as chief pharmacist in order to reach the top rung will be appealing, and it should help encourage younger pharmacists to stay in the hospital sector and not, as some fear, be attracted to the community sector by the promises of the new contract, now with a more clinical profile.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal