Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 274 No 7355 p781
25 June 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Chloramphenicol eye drops not needed for children

Most children who present with infective conjunctivitis in primary care do not need treatment with an antibiotic, according to research published online this week.

Peter Rose, department of primary health care, University of Oxford, and colleagues conducted a randomised controlled trial involving 326 children aged between six months and 12 years with a clinical diagnosis of conjunctivitis. Half of them received chloramphenicol 0.5 per cent eye drops and half received placebo. The drops were instilled in the affected eye every two hours for the first 24 hours then four times a day until 48 hours after symptoms resolved. Children were followed up for six weeks to identify relapse.

The researchers found that there was no significant difference in the clinical cure rate, with 86 per cent of children in the chloramphenicol group and 83 per cent of children in the placebo group having no symptoms at day 7. The mean difference in time to clinical cure was 0.3 days (standard deviation 0.75 to 0.09 days). Bacterial eradication was higher in the chloramphenicol group (40 per cent) than the placebo group (23 per cent). Relapse rate was less than 5 per cent and cases were evenly distributed between the groups.

“We have shown that symptoms resolve without antibiotics in most children with acute infective conjunctivitis,” say the researchers. They add: “About half a day was gained in time to resolution between children treated with antibiotic and those with placebo, but this gain has to be weighed against the personal and health care costs of a condition that improves without treatment.”

Commenting on the decision to make chloramphenicol available over the counter, Dr Rose told The Journal: “This decision seems to continue to medicalise a mild and self-limiting condition. I hope that pharmacists will tell parents of children with conjunctivitis that the treatment does not convey any significant benefits to the rate of cure, in which case most parents will not purchase it.”

David Pruce, director of practice and quality improvement at the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, said: “We would like to reassure pharmacists that the Society’s guidance regarding OTC chloramphenicol in the management of acute bacterial conjunctivitis reflects current best practice.” He added that the Society believes that an in-depth analysis of the paper and more comprehensive research and data is required before any consideration is given to whether or not there needs to be a change in pharmacy or medical practice.

The research is accessible on The Lancet's website

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal