Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7357 p45
9 July 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 80K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Drug administration
· National boards
· Controlled drugs
· The Society
· Supermarket pharmacy (2)
· Birdsgrove House (2)
· New pharmacy contract (2)
· Prescribing
· Education


Letters to the Editor

National boards

Concerns

From Mr S. Wheatley, MRPharmS

As we participate in the consultation concerning the proposal for Royal Pharmaceutical Society national boards for England, Scotland and Wales, we should be careful to ask ourselves some fundamental questions.

The pharmacy strategies for the three countries, as outlined in “Pharmacy in the future”, “The right medicine” and “Remedies for success”, describe only minor variations in the ways in which pharmacy services will be delivered. There are no basic differences apparent and, particularly, none relating to the core function of supply in the community pharmacy setting. In the main, prescriptions will be produced, medicines dispensed and patients advised in the time-honoured way. Any small differences between the pharmacy strategies for the three countries can continue to be easily addressed by the current mechanisms, the Lambeth machine and the Scottish and Welsh Executives. There can be no justification to add to the bureaucracy that already exists.

There are two areas of major concern:

1. By its own admission, the consultation document concedes that it is likely, even inevitable, that there will be cost implications deriving from the restructuring and provision of additional functionality in Edinburgh, Cardiff and London. Any costs involved should be self-funding and, above all, must not cascade down to the members through retention fee increases. I agree that “clearly any solution will need to be affordable”.

2. Why is there only one option on offer — the conclusion arrived at in the Fraser report? Have other simpler, less costly, alternatives been considered? It is tempting to conclude that it is a “done deal” and that we are presented with a solution looking for a problem.

So, in principle for the reasons outlined above, I am unable to support the establishment of national boards for England, Scotland and Wales or any of the three countries.

Stan Wheatley
Blandford Forum, Dorset

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Drug administration)
Next Topic (Controlled drugs)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal