Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7357 p37
9 July 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Concerns over retained purchase profits allayed

Steve Dunn

Steve Dunn: warned that DoH is on track to take extra £200m

Concerns that the Department of Health looks set to take £200m too much out of retained purchase profits have been allayed by the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee.

Steve Dunn, group managing director of AAH Pharmaceuticals, has warned: “After analysing our sales figures since April, I believe that the DoH is currently on track to take an extra £200m out of retained purchase profits. Estimates for category M sales to date show that the April and July Drug Tariff recalibrations equate to an approximate annualised reduction of £500m from the supply chain.”

However, the PSNC has said that it is monitoring the recovery of purchase profits and will ensure that only the target £300m is removed.

Commenting on the new arrangements for generics reimbursement that were announced last week (PJ, 2 July, p3), Mr Dunn said: “Wholesalers and pharmacists had imagined that the new system would lead to a more stable and predictable environment than the one that we currently find ourselves in. Instead, that environment is one marked by major volatility of the generics tariff from quarter to quarter.”

In a statement, the PSNC explained that category M prices are changed every quarter with the target being to remove £75m from generics reimbursement (so a total of £300m is removed annually). “If there has been any over- or under-recovery in practice, adjustments are made as part of the quarterly review,” it added.

The PSNC went on to explain that the substantial changes to category M prices for July to September were mainly due to the removal of amlodipine from the category M list. “PSNC is monitoring the impact of these changes to ensure that over the course of the year only the target £300m is removed.”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal