Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7357 p41
9 July 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Both aspirin and vitamin E fail to reduce cancer risk

Aspirin

Aspirin does not protect over 10 years

Taking low-dose aspirin every other day does not reduce the risk of a healthy woman developing cancer, newly analysed data suggest.

As part of the Women’s Health Study, conducted in the US from 1992 to 2004, 39,876 women aged 45 years or older who had no history of cancer were randomised to receive 100mg aspirin or placebo every other day.

After 10 years, aspirin was not seen to have had any effect on the risk of total cancers (relative risk 1.01, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.94–1.08; P=0.87). No effect was seen on the risk of breast cancer, colorectal cancer or several other site specific cancers, although there was a trend towards lower lung cancer risk (0.78, 0.59–1.03; P=0.08).

Compliance (defined as taking at least two thirds of the study tablets) averaged 73 per cent, and was slightly lower in the aspirin group.

The researchers conclude that despite a growing body of evidence supporting a protective effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, their data suggest there is no such effect for most cancers. They add that direct randomised trial data would be needed to determine whether higher doses of aspirin taken daily would provide adequate chemoprotection (JAMA 2005;294:47).

Further results from the WHS reported this week show that vitamin E does not provide protection against cardiovascular disease or cancer. The same group of women received vitamin E 600IU or placebo on alternate days. After 10 years, no overall benefit was seen in terms of major cardiovascular events or development of cancer and taking the vitamin did not affect total mortality. However, there was a reduction in the proportion of cardiovascular deaths, and in the proportion of major cardiovascular events in women aged at least 65 years, data which the researchers say should be further explored (ibid, p56). (See also PJ, 12 March, p291.)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal