Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7361 p162
6 August 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 70K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Preregistration (2)
· Registration
· Adverse drug reactions
· Birdsgrove House


Letters to the Editor

Preregistration

Plans to make OCSE a component of registration exam (Mr G. C. Paul)

Training year completed before degree was beneficial (Mr A. R. Korsner)

Plans to make OCSE a component of registration exam

From Mr G. C. Paul, MRPharmS

I refer to the letter from Sultan Dajani (PJ, 16 July, p82).
The importance and relevance of objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) has been recognised by the British Pharmaceutical Students’ Association for several years and a motion was supported and passed at the 63rd BPSA annual conference that “the Royal Pharmaceutical Society should be moving towards incorporating an OSCE as an integral component of the registration exam”. It was considered that an OSCE would be an excellent way of testing the communication skills of a preregistration trainee. An OSCE examination would be an additional method of ensuring that similar standards are met by all the candidates of the registration examination, and would also allow assessment of practice-relevant skills.

Furthermore, the OSCE is an integral part of the assessment of other health care professionals, which supports the rationale for the incorporation of OSCEs into the training of future pharmacists.

Many students have encountered the OSCE during the course of their undergraduate training and believe it to be a useful form of assessment. Within an OSCE scenario there is the opportunity for examiners to test and challenge candidates’ knowledge and communication skills thoroughly, but in turn there is also the opportunity for candidates to demonstrate their abilities. The BPSA supports any development in assessment methods that ensures that the pharmacy workforce is truly fit for the future.

Pharmacists are highly trained and skilled professionals able to adapt and apply the knowledge they have learnt to any situation. The Society should embrace any method of assessment that helps confirm these necessary skills are in place in preregistration trainees.

The BPSA fully supports the current work that is being undertaken by the Society to review teaching and assessment of future pharmacists, with the view to incorporating an OSCE into the registration examination, and we look forward to working with the Society on this matter.

Gautam Paul
President
British Pharmaceutical Students’ Associ
ation


Training year completed before degree was beneficial

From Mr A. R. Korsner, MRPharmS

Ian Davis’s (PJ, 23 July, p113) and Sultan Dajani’s (PJ, 16 July, p82) comments remind me that back in 1968, as was permissible at that time, I completed my preregistration training before starting my degree. This helped me immensely. I was au fait with the practices and processes of the profession and familiar with the available medicines. At college, the knowledge I had acquired during the preregistration year gave me much confidence and I was able to concentrate far more on the science and professionalism of practice, while others learnt the dose and uses of such everyday items as paraldehyde enemas. It gave far more insight and appreciation into what we were actually being taught and meaningful reasons for it. I would commend this, at least in part, for the future. I believe that fewer would fail the registration examination if this were done.

Adrian Korsner
London

Send your letter to The Editor

Next Topic (Registration)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal