Home > PJ (current issue) > The Society / News Centre | Search

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7361 p173
6 August 2005


Society summary


Amendment made to Society’s guidance on “Raising concerns”

Following the July meeting of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s Law and Ethics Committee an additional section has been made to “Raising concerns: guidance for pharmacists and registered pharmacy technicians”, which was published as a centre pull-out in The Journal of 30 April.

The guidance provides advice for pharmacists and technicians who may have concerns about a health care practitioner’s fitness to practise. The new section has been added to advise those who may need to balance a duty of confidentiality with their duty to report concerns.

The Society says: “Pharmacists and registered pharmacy technicians have a professional responsibility to act quickly to protect patients by raising concerns if they have good reason to believe that a colleague or other health professional may not be fit to practise for reasons of health, conduct or competence.

“However, it is recognised that pharmacists and registered pharmacy technicians may acquire information relating to the health, conduct or competence of a health professional to whom they have a duty of confidence (eg, where the health professional is a patient or client). In these circumstance pharmacists and registered pharmacy technicians have to balance their duty to respect and protect confidentiality with their commitment to protect patients and the public from risk.”

Lynsey Balmer, the Society’s head of professional ethics, said: “The amendment is intended to inform pharmacists and registered pharmacy technicians that, where a duty of confidence exists, they would not normally be expected to disclose confidential information unless, for example, they believe that the health professional may pose a serious threat to the safety of themselves, a patient or the public.”

The new section 9 is set out overleaf in the same typestyle as the 30 April PJ pull-out so that it can be cut out or photocopied and kept with that document (amended PDF 170K). The existing sections 9 to 12 should be renumbered 10 to 13.

A revised version of the guidance is also available to download from the practice guidance section of the Society’s website.

9. Raising concerns where a duty of confidence exists

During the course of professional practice, or when undertaking volunteer work, pharmacists and pharmacy technicians may have a patient or client who is a health care professional. As part of this they may acquire confidential information relating to the health care professional’s health, conduct or competence. Pharmacists and registered pharmacy technicians are expected to respect and protect the confidentiality of information obtained in the course of their professional activities. Where a duty of confidence exists, the principles of confidentiality require that patient- or client-specific information is not disclosed without consent, other than in exceptional circumstances. An example of such exceptional circumstances is where disclosure is necessary to prevent serious injury or damage to the health of a patient, a third party or to the public.

At times pharmacists and registered pharmacy technicians may be required to balance their duty to respect and protect confidentiality with their duty to protect patients and the public from risk, if there is good reason to believe that the health care professional may not be fit to practise. In these circumstances pharmacists and registered pharmacy technicians will be required to use their professional judgement to determine whether, based on the information they have, they believe that the health care professional may pose a serious risk to the safety of themselves, other patients or the public. If so, pharmacists and registered pharmacy technicians must act quickly to inform an appropriate person, authority or regulatory body.

In circumstances where the health care professional’s health, conduct or competence is not considered to pose an immediate danger to patient or public safety, confidentiality should be respected. Pharmacists and registered pharmacy technicians should, however, endeavour to encourage the health care professional to seek appropriate help or support to try to prevent problems escalating to a point where fitness to practise may be compromised.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal