Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7363 p225
20 August 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 100K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· MDSs (4)
· Regulation
· Pharmacy practice (2)
· Hospital disinfection
· Controlled drugs
· Pharmacogenomics
· Registration examination (2)
· Retention fees (4)


Letters to the Editor

Regulation

Nurses and midwives

From Mr S. Skyte

I am afraid that incorrect information was provided to The Journal about the regulation of nurses and midwives.

In the article on how health care professions manage their non-practising members (PJ, 23 July, p109), the statement that nurses and midwives pay a registration fee regardless of whether they are in practice is not accurate, nor is the statement that they are on the register for life. That might have been the case 15 years ago but it is not now. When they renew their registration every three years, nurses and midwives have to confirm that they have undertaken a specific minimum number of hours in practice. If they cannot do this, their registration lapses. Far from always being on the register, the current Nursing and Midwifery Council register of some 670,000 people reflects nurses and midwives in actual practice.

It is also not the case that retired practitioners can stay on the register regardless of whether they are in practice. Unless they renew their registration based on the minimum practice hours, their registration lapses.

Stuart Skyte
Head of Communications
Nursing and Midwifery Council

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (MDSs)
Next Topic (Pharmacy practice)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal