| · Homoeopathy (5)
· Pharmacy practice
· Reciprocity
· NICE
· Retention fees
· Sexual health
· Media representation (3)
· Emergency supplies
· The Society
Letters to the Editor
|
NICE
Will not and cannot end postcode prescribing
From Mr B. T. Brown, MRPharmS
The headline to my
letter “Ending postcode prescribing a bad idea” (PJ,
3 September, p282) is the sole property of the PJ. The import of my letter
was that the National Institute for
Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)
will not and cannot end “postcode prescribing”. Both central
planners and the media must debunk the idea that NICE will bring an end
to the concept and inflate consumer expectation in the process.
Paradoxically, much lobbying that led to the establishment of NICE was
supported directly or indirectly by “big pharma”. Understandably
the industry does like local formulary decisions that side-line drugs
accepted by others. Because there is this form of market in place there
is scope for the use of a wide range of drugs and competition that underpins
research and development.
If NICE develops a de facto national formulary, “big pharma” may
become very selective in its product development. Cutting edge research
would be impeded. The flow of new treatments may slow significantly and
potential treatments may be denied to patients. The end of “postcode
prescribing” sought by “big pharma” may be counter-productive
and not actually what it wants.
NICE is probably here to stay but my concern is that we, as health care
professionals, risk ascribing unachievable aims to it. What is imperative
is that we do not inflate consumer expectation by pretending that NICE
is what it clearly is not and will deliver what it cannot.
Etymologists may enjoy the Oxford English Dictionary root of the word “nice”.
Its use as an acronym here just may be inappropriate.
Bruce T. Brown
Birmingham
|