Home > PJ (current issue) > Reviews | Search

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7366 p315
10 September 2005

Books

Valuable addition to literature on economic evaluation, relevant to NHS decision making

Essentials of economic evaluation in healthcare’, by Rachel Elliott and Katherine Payne. Pp xviii+235. Price £24.95. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2005. ISBN 0 85369 574 1


Essentials of economic evaluation in healthcareThis is a useful and comprehensive addition to the literature and a good, systematic guide to material of increasing importance in terms of policy making. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is growing into its role of being the rationing agent for the NHS in England and Wales. Rationing or depriving patients of care from which they would benefit and which they desire is unavoidable and NICE’s role is to make a critical appraisal of competing technologies to determine their relative cost effectiveness and suitability for reimbursement in the NHS. Their appraisal technique is economic evaluation.

After initial chapters on health economics and rationing, the authors examine the concepts of cost (the value of what is given up when a therapy is adopted) and benefit (the value of what is gained when a therapy is adopted) before providing three lucid chapters on cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis and cost-benefit analysis. They then proceed to examine the use of decision analysis, the use of economic evaluation in decision making, statistical issues and valuing preferences.

All this is done with clarity, with each chapter having worked examples of issues covered, eg, the use of discounting, self-directed study exercises, references and further reading. The book is completed with a glossary and index.

Inevitably, there are some problems. For instance, while efficacy is defined in the text (p68), it is not included in the glossary. The discussion of bias in randomised controlled trials might have offered more on statistical power issues and the creation of bias due to commercial perversion of trial design and reporting.

Although nothing in life is perfect, this is a valuable addition to the guidebook literature on economic evaluation. Hopefully, subsequent editions will maintain the clarity of presentation as the subject literature develops and becomes even more central to decision making in the NHS and every other health care system.


Alan Maynard (professor of health economics at the University of York)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal