Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7367 p339
17 September 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 110K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Homoeopathy (5)
· Dermatology
· Spacer devices
· The profession
· Best use of medicines
· Pharmacists in the media
· Reciprocity
· Return to practice
· The Society (4)


Letters to the Editor

Reciprocity

Pharmaceutical Society of Australia hopes that reason will prevail

From Mr B. Grogan

As national president of the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, I have been disappointed by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain’s decision to end reciprocal registration arrangements and impose an onerous adjudication process on Australian pharmacy graduates. The current system has served both countries well for many, many years.

I understand the decision to change reciprocity arrangements derives from EU requirements, but I cannot understand why such an extraordinary adjudication process is deemed necessary or even beneficial.

The undergraduate courses at all of Australia’s pharmacy schools are mapped to the PSA’s “Competency standards for pharmacists in Australia 2003”. Australia and the PSA are justifiably proud of the quality of our graduates. Is there evidence of incompetence from the many Australian pharmacists who have been employed in the UK over recent years? Has the UK health system changed so dramatically that our pharmacists would have difficulty applying their skills?

I have heard that several UK pharmacy schools have plans to set up bridging courses for Australians to meet the anticipated new requirements (which involve an additional two years of study and supervision at a cost of up to £8,500). I would suggest to these institutions that they examine their plans carefully because our feedback indicates that, but for some rare exceptions, Australian graduates will not be interested in enrolling.

The working holiday has long been a popular way for pharmacists and, indeed, Australians of all professions to experience the UK. I do not believe this practice will cease, but that Australian pharmacists will simply seek employment in the bars and restaurants of the UK rather than the dispensaries of your hospitals and high-street pharmacies. Unfortunately, the PSA is no longer in the position to promote the option of working in the UK health system to our members.

Australia has adopted a reasonable and rational approach for pharmacists who qualify overseas to enter the health workforce in this country. This has led to a net gain of pharmacists here, many of whom came to us from the British Isles.

The PSA would urge the Royal Pharmaceutical Society to continue to liaise with Australian registering authorities to find a more rational solution to the issue. It is the PSA’s hope that reason will prevail.

Brian Grogan
National President
Pharmaceutical Society of Australia

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Pharmacists in the media)
Next Topic (Return to practice)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal