Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7368 p368-369
24 September 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 110K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Prescribing (2)
· Compliance (2)
· Residential care
· Metered dosage systems
· Reciprocity
· Proton pump inhibitors
· Registration examination
· The Society (3)
· New pharmacy contract


Letters to the Editor

Compliance

Difficulties in drug-taking apparent in the elderly (Dr T.U. Qazi)

Negative impact of generic prescribing and parallel importing (Ms E. Mitchell)

Difficulties in drug-taking apparent in the elderly

From Dr T.U. Qazi, MRPharmS

The elderly are one group who receive multiple drugs to treat their numerous conditions. They are also well known for non-compliance due to drug-related side effects and other factors such as poor health, confusion, memory loss and lack of motivation. Non-compliance is an issue that has been addressed many times in the past but still remains unresolved.

Recently I noticed that a couple of patients were not taking their warfarin tablets. They had been in hospital not long before this and, after being discharged, had received their medicines from their community pharmacist. The reason they gave for not taking their warfarin tablets was that the new calendar packs, which they had received recently, were from a different manufacturer to those taken in hospital. Non-compliance of warfarin tablets can have serious consequences and the best solution to this situation is to ensure all anticoagulant patients have their medicines in compliance aids.

Another issue that confuses the elderly is the switching of generics to brand generics or vice versa by prescribers. A few elderly patients commented that they did not take their medicines, ie, simvastatin tablets and ramapril capsules, because they looked different to the Simvador and Lopace capsules they had taken previously. This was despite telling them, while I dispensed their drugs, that they were being given the same medicines, just with a different appearance and name. It is also the prescriber’s responsibility to explain to the patient that even though their medicines may vary in colour, shape and name, it is still the same drug.

Most manufacturers of generics market different drugs in calendar packs of a similar appearance.

Elderly patients who suffer from colour blindness or poor vision may find it difficult to differentiate between such calendar packs. It has been reported that patients who were taking medicines for several different conditions were confused because of the similarity and this had serious consequences. It also increases the chance of error in a busy pharmacy.

Compliance in the elderly can only improve if doctor-patient and patient-pharmacist relationships improve. We should be polite, understanding and patient-oriented in the transfer of medicines information.

Tariq Qazi
Halifax, West Yorkshire


Negative impact of generic prescribing and parallel importing

From Ms E. Mitchell, MRPharmS

I am writing as a representative of the Dementia Services Collaborative User and Carer Group in Calderdale, which I attend as the South-West Yorkshire mental health trust location pharmacist. The group wishes to highlight some problems that occur due to present practices, and how they relate to the people using services.

In particular, I wish to highlight problems relating to the use of generically prescribed tablets and parallel importing. As a pharmacist I realise the problems we face when ordering items from wholesalers and the limited availability of generic lines occasionally. However, if tablets change colour, shape and size, this can often cause problems for people with impaired memory and result in non-compliance, even though carers can understand substitutions. Changes of this nature should be kept to a minimum. The packaging of medicines is important for this user group, who are best served using blister packs with the days of the week printed on. The packaging should also be in English.

This is an appeal to pharmacists to keep changes of tablet colour, shape and size to a minimum for their customers with memory impairment, and to keep English labelled calendar packs. Until services change, carers will be struggling on, but any help will be appreciated.

Members of the user and carer group do appreciate and acknowledge all the efforts of local community pharmacy services and have a good rapport with local pharmacies. Monitored-dosage systems do enable many memory impaired people to keep some control over their medicines since they can take premeasured doses at the indicated times in their own homes and this can be checked by themselves and their carers.

The shortage of community pharmacists willing to give their services for free to fill monitored dosage systems has not substantially affected services yet, as it has in other areas. Free services are limited and we know the true cost to the pharmacist in real monetary terms so we do not want to overload those who provide this service. Keeping tablet presentation constant would go a long way to help resolve some of the difficulties and non-compliance issues with medicines, that frustrate both carers and users of our service.

We would welcome pharmacists’ comments and input.

Elaine Mitchell
Calderdale Royal Hospital,
Halifax, West Yorkshire HX3 OPW

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Prescribing)
Next Topic (Residential care)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal