Home > PJ (current issue) > Leading articles | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7373 p536
29 October 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 50K, Acrobat Reader

Leading Articles

Keep yellow cards at hand more
What do you know about confidentiality? more


Keep yellow cards at hand

Periodic attempts are made to increase the number of reports of adverse reactions to drugs. The original yellow card scheme — launched over 40 years ago — was exclusive to doctors but other health professionals and patients have since been included (p537).

The scheme for patients is now being rolled out across the UK although it is still called a pilot, which suggests the Medical and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency is still not certain that this scheme will bring the returns it hopes. The MHRA working group responsible for patient reporting was said, at the end of last year, to be in the process of designing the best systems to enable patients to report suspected ADRs and predicted there would be final systems in place by 2006.

Fortunately, the yellow card scheme is not the only method that the Committee on Safety of Medicines relies on to check the safety of marketed medicines. Nevertheless, it is an important part of the process because it is more likely to reveal the true scale of both trivial and significant side effects once a drug is available throughout the NHS.

There is no question, however, that ADRs are under-reported. Health care professionals are often reluctant to report seemingly trivial experiences faced by patients, particularly if they believe the problems are unlikely to affect the licensing of the drug involved or its summary of product characteristics. Pharmacists may believe more significant problems will be reported by medical colleagues. In both instances, information that would be of value to the CSM may be lost.

With the inclusion of patients in the scheme, pharmacists probably need reminding that this is not an excuse for them to report even fewer ADRs. The information that patients provide will inevitably be of a different nature to that given by a health professional. So if a patient believes a side effect is worth reporting, so should those people involved in his or her care. As reported in The Journal in 2002 (6 July p14) the merest suspicion of an ADR should have pharmacists reaching for a yellow card. This still applies if the system is to be effective.

Back to Top

What do you know about confidentiality?

Most people will have had some direct experience of the workings of recent data protection legislation. Pharmacists, in particular, need to be aware of how it impacts on record-keeping and other aspects of practice. The Royal Pharmaceutical Society has put together some guidance that encompasses the Data Protection Act, the Human Rights Act, the NHS code of practice on confidentiality and, in the light of the new community pharmacy contracts, what pharmacists need to do to be fully compliant with the various pieces of legislation (p555).

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal