Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7373 p538
29 October 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary


Generics proposals undermine pharmacy funding

Generics reimbursement

Dispensing profit agreement is threatened by new plan for generics reimbursement

Pharmacy negotiators are at loggerheads with the Department of Health over its proposals for the reimbursement of branded generic medicines. The Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee said it was “alarmed” that nearly a third of the branded generics the DoH intends to remove from the Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS) are discontinued drugs.

It also repeated its opposition to the Government’s proposals to reimburse branded generics in the same way as generic medicines, claiming the change threatens the guaranteed £500m retained purchase profit margin promised in the new contract.

The PSNC argues that pharmacy profit levels would be reduced if the Government reimburses branded generics at the lesser of either the Drug Tariff price or the branded generic standard list price.

PSNC chief executive Sue Sharpe told the DoH this week: “The proposal as it stands would do nothing but encourage branded generic prescribing, damage the competitive generic market, undermine the basis for funding of community pharmacy and would substantially drive up costs for the NHS.”

Her comments come in the PSNC’s response (PDF 210K) to a second consultation on the issue of reimbursement for branded generic drugs. The deadline for comments ran out this week. This second consultation focused on seeking comments on the list of proposed branded generics the DoH wants to remove from the PPRS. More than a third of the drugs on the list have been discontinued — one of them more than 10 years ago.

Mrs Sharpe told the DoH that the out-of-date list “could indicate that this issue has been treated by the Department with a lack of attention to detail and a failure to comprehend either the relevant market or the impact of the proposed changes.”

The PSNC’s attempt to bring the focus of the consultation back to the impact the changes will have on the new contract are, however, likely to fail. In the latest consultation document, which highlights the comments to the original consultation earlier this year, the DoH claims there is nothing in the new community pharmacy contract that protects the individual earnings of pharmacies.

It also said “it should not be the case” that the £500m retained profit margin would be jeopardised by the new reimbursement arrangements but promised “the Department of Health and the PSNC will monitor these margins in order to ensure the retained margin is not jeopardised”.

NPA response The National Pharmacy Association has said that standard branded generics should be treated as true generics. NPA chairman Raj Patel said this week: “In negotiating the new pharmacy contract a reduction in generic pricing was agreed, but this proposal for the pricing of standard branded generics via a new Drug Tariff Category S will disrupt the fair funding principle.”

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal