Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7374 p576
5 November 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 120K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· IPF
· GHP (2)
· BPC
· Medicines use reviews
· Drug classification
· Alternative therapies
· Controlled drugs
· North East London LPC (3)
· The Society
· Pharmacists in the media


Letters to the Editor

Drug classification

Proposals to declassify fluconazole to GSL status

From Dr P. Fellows

I was concerned to read the application to reclassify the fluconazole 150mg tablet from a pharmacy (P) medicine to general sale list (GSL) medicine (PJ, 1 October, p398) making it more available for women to self-select.

Although I appreciate that there may be some advantages from deregulation, such as the convenience of purchase and early treatment of a condition, I believe these benefits are hugely outweighed by the safety issues of self-selection.

First, switching fluconazole to GSL, enables the consumer to purchase it from any shop at any hour of the day. However, I believe treatment of thrush can wait until the morning and patients should wait until the pharmacy opens to ensure the advice and protection of a pharmacist.

Fluconazole should not be used by women who are pregnant, may be pregnant or are breastfeeding. There must be a number of women who go to the pharmacy to purchase a fluconazole tablet, only to be advised by the pharmacist that it is not to be taken under these circumstances. Will a pack on a shelf in the supermarket allow this same level of advice and will women read the packaging leaflet sufficiently to glean the right information?

Another concern is that fluconazole is only recommended if women know they are suffering from thrush and have used it before. This is something pharmacists will always ask their customers. With self-selection the problem that can occur is incorrect diagnosis. Symptoms could in fact be something more serious such as gonorrhoea or chlamydia.

For these women, self-treating with fluconazole is wholly inappropriate and could delay them getting the right treatment for their specific condition.

Finally, fluconazole is also known to interact with some other medicines due to its action on cytochrome P450. It has potential serious interactions with other drugs, eg, some antihistamines.

I look forward to understanding how the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency intends to tackle these concerns. Meanwhile, I cannot help thinking that taking medicines like fluconazole out of pharmacy jurisdiction is removing an important safety net that is there to protect the public’s health.

Peter Fellows
Chairman of the Clinical and Prescribing Subcommittee of the General Practitioners Committee

 

STEPHEN HALLWORTH, press officer at the MHRA responds:

The consultation exercise (ARM 33) on the proposal to reclassify fluconazole 150mg capsules from a pharmacy medicine to a general sale list medicine has been ongoing until 1 November. Reclassification is about widening choice and access and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency is keen to receive all comments and opinions. We will ensure that this letter is included as a response to the consultation exercise and is considered along with all the other responses received.

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Medicines use reviews)
Next Topic (Alternative therapies)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal