Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7375 p608
12 November 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 100K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Adverse reactions
· Drug interactions (2)
· Packaging
· GHP (2)
· Pricing
· Clinical governance
· The profession
· Pharmacy workforce
· Communication
· Registration


Letters to the Editor

Communication

Gobbledegook

From Mr R. Sturgess, MRPharmS

The seriousness of the outbreak of gobbledegook and buzz word addiction among civil servants is illustrated in the article “Practice-based commissioning views” (PJ, 22 October, p517 PDF (100K)).

We have civil servant Trish O’Gorman, whose job title is too long to quote, saying “the key driver was to look for more and better engagement with local clinicians” when, by the buzz word “driver”, she meant “incentive”.

Clearly the disease is spreading to academia, since Angela Alexander, senior lecturer (of gobbledegook?), University of Reading, suggests that “management models within multiples be taken forward to incentivise pharmacists” when presumably instead of the non-existent verb “to incentivise”, she means “to stimulate”.

The virus has even penetrated the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s headquarters. Rob Darracott, director of corporate and strategic development at the Society, being unable to see “how a workforce of up to a quarter of a million people can be incentivised to be at the heart of this” (the commissioning of a patient-led NHS).

Perhaps the Society can incentivise a manufacturer to produce an anti-buzz word vaccine?

Ray Sturgess
Knaresborough, North Yorkshire

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Pharmacy workforce)
Next Topic (Registration)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal