Inform patients about unfunded medicines
It is unethical to withhold information about treatments from patients because of concerns about their capacity to pay, even if such discussions cause distress to some patients, a group of Australian oncologists argue in last week’s BMJ (2005;331:1075).
The authors surveyed the attitudes of 184 Australian oncologists to three
clinical scenarios in which treatment with a hypothetical unsubsidised
drug was associated with a significant clinical benefit. Across the scenarios,
only 28–41 per cent of oncologists said they would discuss the
unsubsidised treatment options, mainly because of concerns about the
potential psychological and emotional effect these discussions might
have on patients and families.
However, the authors say that it is inappropriate for doctors to make
an evaluation of what is in a person’s overall interests. “Not
only does withholding information about unsubsidised drugs fail to respect
autonomy, it may not be in the patient’s best interests,” they
argue. |