Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7377 p660
26 November 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 80K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Skin cancer
· Independent prescribing
· The profession
· Supervision
· Safety of medicines
· Drug interactions
· Pricing
· Titles


Letters to the Editor

Skin cancer

Sunbathing in the middle of the day is dangerous

From Mr P. Lapsley

I write to express my concern about the debate featured in the PJ (12 November, p613, and 19 November, p633) surrounding the Sunsmart campaign.

The Skin Care Campaign has been actively involved with Cancer Research UK in the development of the Sunsmart campaign, as it offers a valuable opportunity to educate the public about the potential harm of excess sunlight exposure. The Sunsmart campaign has never advocated sun avoidance but simply recommends sensible precautions, especially between 11am and 3pm. With the rising incidence of malignant melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers and their precursors, including actinic keratoses, and basal and squamous cell carcinomas, a campaign of this sort has never been more important.

In the Caucasian population, the argument that vitamin D deficiency is a reason to promote sunbathing and sun exposure during the middle of the day, when ultraviolet light is most powerful and damaging, is flawed. At worst, it might be dangerous if it hinders the public’s currently improving awareness of the need for sun sense and protection from excessive UV exposure.

Pharmacists have a valuable, central role to play in advising people about sensible sun exposure. It would be most unfortunate if their messages were to be diluted by a small body of evidence around vitamin D deficiency, in the presence of overwhelming data about the potential adverse effects of over exposure to the sun.

Peter Lapsley
Chief Executive
Skin Care Campaign

Send your letter to The Editor

Next Topic (Independent prescriber)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal