Home > PJ (current issue) > News / News Centre | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7378 p679
3 December 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

  Acrobat Reader


News summary

Related websites
Community Pharmacy Wales (CPW) response PDF (130K)


Judge contract applications on essential services only, say pharmacists in Wales

Applications for NHS pharmacy contracts in Wales should not be decided on the basis of ability to provide either advanced or enhanced pharmaceutical services, Community Pharmacy Wales has told the Welsh Assembly Government.

Responding to a WAG consultation on reforming the rules governing contract applications, CPW takes the view that only an ability to deliver essential services is relevant to the contract application process. However, it concedes that local health boards (LHBs) could “give due regard” to any potential contractor’s ability to deliver advanced services or to participate in locally commissioned enhanced services.

CPW also opposes the provision of innovative services as a criterion for deciding contract applications. Such services might not be in line with patient needs and could lead to inconsistencies, it says. If innovative services were needed, they would be identified by LHBs and commissioned as enhanced services. CPW opposes the inclusion of improving choice as a determining factor for the same reason. However, it adds that any offers by contract applicants to provide specific services should be binding if the contract is subsequently awarded.

On patient needs, CPW suggests that LHBs should be required to carry out annual pharmaceutical needs assessments.

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal