Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7380 p751
17 December 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 40K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Connecting for health
· Packaging
· Preregistration payments
· Other professions
· The Guild
· Pharmacy monitoring
· Internet eye drops
· Preregistration training
· The Journal


Letters to the Editor

Connecting for health

More independent public scrutiny needed

From Mr N. G. Ford, MRPharmS

Andrew Gledhill (PJ, 3 December, p685) informs us that new patient administration systems are to be installed over the next 12 months in most NHS hospitals and confidently predicts that we are to have this technology in place soon and save lives. Although I applaud such optimism I think a word of caution might be appropriate, based on long years of experience in using information technology in the acute sector.

From my experience there has to be a strong commitment by local management, clinical staff and local IT competence to implement these systems successfully. At Burton Hospitals NHS Trust we have a system that has been slowly developing over a number of years and has a sophisticated electronic prescribing and drug administration system integrated into a fairly comprehensive electronic patient record system. Our systems have involved many years of commitment and have overcome many technical, managerial and local political obstacles. We have found that system specifications can become a dreamy wish list if not structured into a realistic implementation strategy, and based solidly on existing and proven technology. So the complexity and commitment required at a local level to get these systems to work must not be underestimated. Regretfully, our system, along with other systems, is sometimes referred to as a “legacy” system either for convenience or through ignorance of the level of functionality achieved.

The national Connecting for Health programme, as its name suggests, seems to be changing the emphasis to connecting our systems and pooling key information needed for improving communication and patient care. Much of the essential infrastructure to enable this technology, both hardware and standardised coding is at last being put into place. However, it will always be up to local trust management and employees to put in the necessary hard work to develop and implement local systems that can exploit this new information infrastructure that will, we hope, evolve in the coming years over the NHSnet and provide support to clinical staff in caring for patients. I am not sure this technology will save many lives, but it will certainly help us treat patients more effectively, improve safety, efficiency and quality of care and may even improve the flagging image of the NHS as a well run service.

The National Programme for IT has made a lot of promises, many of which are being honoured in the primary sector. I await with interest developments in the secondary sector. No one can doubt the aims of the programme but I believe more independent public scrutiny of the programme is needed because of the large sums of money and commercial interest involved and better use made of all that hard-won experience from the users of existing systems.

Nick Ford
Burton on Trent, Staffordshire

Send your letter to The Editor

Next Topic (Packaging)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal