Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

PJ Online homeThe Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 275 No 7381 p774
24/31 December 2005

This article
Reprint   Photocopy

PDF 40K, Acrobat Reader

Letters

· Medicines use reviews
· COX-2s
· Registration
· Other professions
· Prescription charges
· CPD
· Fitness to practise


Letters to the Editor

Other professions

Assumption was not unjustified

From Mrs H. Ferguson, MRPharmS

In her recent letter (PJ, 17 December, p752), Alison Cooper rails against Irram Irshad’s suggestion — that GPs ignore the work done by pharmacists — with all the zeal to be hoped for in a recent convert. Dr Cooper asserts that the suggestion is a “complete assumption” on the part of Miss Irshad. Although this may be correct, let us not suppose that Miss Irshad’s assumption was unjustified.

In my 10 years’ experience as a community pharmacist working in two different locations, I have grown accustomed to being treated by GPs with indifference and, occasionally, contempt. The sad fact is that there still exists a significant number of GPs who simply refuse to enter into the discussion of patient care with pharmacists.

Dr Cooper is right to remind us to be cautious of generalisations — indeed, my experiences have not been entirely negative. I am fortunate enough to enjoy a healthy professional relationship with one of the three medical practices in my area but, if a generalisation is to be made, it would be naive in the extreme to allow that Dr Cooper speaks for the average member of her new profession.

Helen Ferguson
Felixstowe, Suffolk

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Registration)
Next Topic (Prescription charges)

Back to Top


©The Pharmaceutical Journal